From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arend Van Spriel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] brcmfmac: sdio: Disable auto-tuning around commands expected to fail Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 20:56:43 +0200 Message-ID: <16b334cd9f8.2764.9b12b7fc0a3841636cfb5e919b41b954@broadcom.com> References: <20190603183740.239031-1-dianders@chromium.org> <20190603183740.239031-4-dianders@chromium.org> <42fc30b1-adab-7fa8-104c-cbb7855f2032@intel.com> <16b305a7110.2764.9b12b7fc0a3841636cfb5e919b41b954@broadcom.com> <16b3223dea0.2764.9b12b7fc0a3841636cfb5e919b41b954@broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Doug Anderson Cc: Adrian Hunter , Ulf Hansson , Kalle Valo , brcm80211-dev-list.pdl-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Double Lo , Brian Norris , linux-wireless , Naveen Gupta , Madhan Mohan R , Matthias Kaehlcke , Wright Feng , Chi-Hsien Lin , netdev , brcm80211-dev-list , "David S. Miller" , Franky Lin , LKML List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org On June 7, 2019 8:06:30 PM Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:32 AM Arend Van Spriel > wrote: >> >> Right. I know it supports initial tuning, but I'm not sure about subsequent >> retuning initiated by the host controller. > > My evidence says that it supports subsequent tuning. In fact, without > this series my logs would be filled with: > > dwmmc_rockchip ff0d0000.dwmmc: Successfully tuned phase to XYZ > > ...where the phase varied by a few degrees each time. AKA: it was > retuning over and over again and getting sane results which implies > that the tuning was working just fine. Ok. Thanks for confirming this. Regards, Arend