From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add domain-supply for pd_rkvdec0/1 and pd_venc0/1
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2026 14:11:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1849787.VLH7GnMWUR@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea9df274-278d-f344-f66d-8821388e6690@rock-chips.com>
Hi Shawn,
Am Freitag, 13. Februar 2026, 03:42:07 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Shawn Lin:
> 在 2026/02/13 星期五 10:35, Shawn Lin 写道:
> > The power domains pd_rkvdec0/1 and pd_venc0/1 depend on two voltage supplies,
> > vdd_vdenc_s0 and vdd_vdenc_mem_s0. These supplies might be missing or cause probe
> > deferral. Since the Rockchip power domain management code currently supports managing
> > only one power supply, and both supplies belong to the same PMIC (making it highly
> > unlikely for one to be available while the other is not), a practical solution is
> > implemented.
> >
> > Both supplies are configured with the boot-on and always-on properties. Only one
> > of them is assigned as the domain-supply for pd_rkvdec0/1 and pd_venc0/1. This allows
> > the power domain code to perform a nominal enable operation on this single supply,
> > thereby successfully acquiring a reference to both supplies (as they are from the same
> > PMIC). The system then relies on their boot-on and always-on flags to maintain the
> > correct state.
> >
> > Crucially, this approach handles cases like probe deferral correctly:
> > if the PMIC is not yet ready, enabling the power domain will be deferred until the
> > necessary supplies become available.
just as a question, does the board have problems without these supplies?
Aka, is this a fix for a problem, or "just" future proofing the board?
Thanks
Heiko
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
> > ---
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-evb1-v10.dts | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts
> > index c9d284c..09bc7b6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts
> > @@ -568,6 +568,22 @@
> > domain-supply = <&vdd_gpu_s0>;
> > };
> >
> > +&pd_rkvdec0 {
> > + domain-supply = <&vdd_vdenc_s0>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&pd_rkvdec1 {
> > + domain-supply = <&vdd_vdenc_s0>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&pd_venc0 {
> > + domain-supply = <&vdd_vdenc_s0>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&pd_venc1 {
> > + domain-supply = <&vdd_vdenc_s0>;
> > +};
> > +
> > &pinctrl {
> > audio {
> > hp_detect: headphone-detect {
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-evb1-v10.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-evb1-v10.dts
> > index f820505..25d80b6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-evb1-v10.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-evb1-v10.dts
> > @@ -381,6 +381,22 @@
> > domain-supply = <&vdd_gpu_s0>;
> > };
> >
> > +&pd_rkvdec0 {
> > + domain-supply = <&vdd_vdenc_s0>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&pd_rkvdec1 {
> > + domain-supply = <&vdd_vdenc_s0>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&pd_venc0 {
> > + domain-supply = <&vdd_vdenc_s0>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&pd_venc1 {
> > + domain-supply = <&vdd_vdenc_s0>;
> > +};
> > +
> > &pinctrl {
> > audio {
> > hp_detect: headphone-detect {
> > @@ -580,6 +596,7 @@
> > vdd_gpu_mem_s0: dcdc-reg5 {
> > regulator-name = "vdd_gpu_mem_s0";
> > regulator-boot-on;
> > + regulator-always-on;
>
> Oops, I sent the wrong version. Should remove the this line change.
> Will fix it if v2 needed.
>
> > regulator-min-microvolt = <675000>;
> > regulator-max-microvolt = <950000>;
> > regulator-ramp-delay = <12500>;
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-22 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-13 2:35 [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add node name for RK3588_PD_RKVDEC0/1 and RK3588_PD_VENC0/1 Shawn Lin
2026-02-13 2:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add domain-supply for pd_rkvdec0/1 and pd_venc0/1 Shawn Lin
2026-02-13 2:42 ` Shawn Lin
2026-02-22 13:11 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2026-02-22 13:15 ` Heiko Stuebner
2026-02-13 10:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add node name for RK3588_PD_RKVDEC0/1 and RK3588_PD_VENC0/1 Chaoyi Chen
2026-02-13 11:11 ` Shawn Lin
2026-02-24 1:42 ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-02-24 3:14 ` Shawn Lin
2026-02-24 8:51 ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-02-22 22:39 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1849787.VLH7GnMWUR@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox