From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Wenrui Li <wenrui.li-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>,
Brian Norris
<briannorris-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy-rockchip-pcie: remove deassert of phy_rst from exit callback
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 11:18:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <196d1fd0-bcc6-a866-cf90-1623f213ce66@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2348307.ygIaYT7LcH@phil>
On Friday 28 October 2016 02:01 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 13. Oktober 2016, 12:42:13 CEST schrieb Shawn Lin:
>> The deassert of phy_rst from exit callback is incorrect as when
>> doing phy_exit, we expect the phy_rst is on asserted state which was
>> done by power_off callback, but not deasserted state. Meanwhile when
>> disabling clk_pciephy_ref, the assert/deassert signal can't actually
>> take effect on the phy. So let's fix it anyway.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
>
> looks ok to have that removed, as any future phy_init call will make sure it
> gets asserted anyway.
>
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
merged, thanks.
-Kishon
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-05 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 4:42 [PATCH] phy-rockchip-pcie: remove deassert of phy_rst from exit callback Shawn Lin
2016-10-28 8:31 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-11-05 5:48 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=196d1fd0-bcc6-a866-cf90-1623f213ce66@ti.com \
--to=kishon-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=briannorris-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jeffy.chen-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wenrui.li-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox