From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] pwm: add support for atomic update Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 21:08:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20150720200819.GN11162@sirena.org.uk> References: <1437406327-6207-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20150720171950.GE11162@sirena.org.uk> <20150720214913.73c47fa6@bbrezillon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tOEJyvZxeaoVWcY4" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150720214913.73c47fa6@bbrezillon> Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Thierry Reding , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bryan Wu , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Jingoo Han , Lee Jones , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Tomi Valkeinen , Doug Anderson , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Maxime Ripard List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org --tOEJyvZxeaoVWcY4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:49:13PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:31:57PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > - dropped pwm-regulator patches (should be submitted separately) > > I think the second patch needs to go in with this series doesn't it? It > > was just the enable one that was good to go immediately IIRC. > I was planning on submitting those two patches after the PWM changes > have been merged, but you're right, maybe we should think about a proper > way to smoothly get all of them in the same release. I see. We should at least try to get the enable one in this time, I'd like to just apply it and then either do a cross tree merge for the one making use of the new functionality or (if the rest of the series gets held up for some reason) just letting it get merged via Linus' tree. > I have rebased my work on top your regulator/topic/pwm branch containing > Lee's work [1]. > Note that patch 1 has changed a bit to take Lee's additions into > account. > Thierry, could you create a branch based on Mark's regulator/topic/pwm > branch ? > If everybody agrees on the solution I'll send a v3 rebasing my work on > top of this topic branch. I think that's fine for me, I can tag the PWM branch in my tree and Thierry can pull that. --tOEJyvZxeaoVWcY4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVrVUyAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQs+wH/iqSyJYwzHG6KAcehMfPKiEC 1OVQZS/wlHBsKPBTUPPt1yIgD3leQG/lQI4kDOtYRUSiz0u5qrRe+T2NHsDAWpVD e1ArnTPxzERvGw95n3ZNT3rHtBWOIDhNwF7STVnlxYaMytgbdQghQOS4TwupwvwR mTQ4C6VMJvkOscth9QQ5EbC4+M0LghXtFdttIthi7EMZiSP2lcbDpZ+cxp96Uonp TPPS8fxDfY5v/DwToB7L4uYzxDbHK74xjtEuFssJNcykyul6QyS4NuYgi3mPnhxg gFUHHbYbUJMzTDxg9yRNjdqJfDX455ee7DdCXuuWT09gbL2tAPqcO6OhldeZgJk= =dllH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tOEJyvZxeaoVWcY4--