From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] rk3399: make u-boot-rockchip-with-spl.bin Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:59:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20190426175935.GT31207@bill-the-cat> References: <20190426133430.17802-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <90241d1e39fde80f674008878f136e121b5bc6a4.camel@bootlin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8198772857001722895==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <90241d1e39fde80f674008878f136e121b5bc6a4.camel@bootlin.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" To: Paul Kocialkowski Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, U-Boot-Denx , Manivannan Sadhasivam , linux-amarula , Akash Gajjar List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org --===============8198772857001722895== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VOnbToCuTSVGQGT3" Content-Disposition: inline --VOnbToCuTSVGQGT3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 07:55:40PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > Le vendredi 26 avril 2019 =E0 23:22 +0530, Jagan Teki a =E9crit : > > Hi Tom and Simon, > >=20 > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:04 PM Jagan Teki = wrote: > > > This series will create single bootable image 'u-boot-rockchip-with-s= pl.bin' > > > for rk3399 platform with single make command instead of building u-bo= ot > > > separately for u-boot.itb and burn them separately for SPL and U-Boot= proper. > > >=20 > > > This series has dependecy with[1] > > >=20 > > > travis-ci issue: > > > - need to include 'python-pyelftools' package, tried but can't succeed > > > - right now build failed if BL31 is not exported, but this would mana= ge to > > > create dummy arm64 elf but any help on this would appreciate. > >=20 > > Any inputs on this? >=20 > I think we have the same issue regarding BL31 for ARM64 sunxi boards > don't we? >=20 > It would be great to have a solution to this, and even better if it > could scale to most ARM64 platforms too! As I said in another thread, yes, we really should look at how to make binman take care of this as every arm64 platform has the same problem and similar but not quite the same solution. --=20 Tom --VOnbToCuTSVGQGT3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJcw0cGAAoJEIf59jXTHXZS3CkP/j3mk9kiMmFUlhBLhNPXWUwK AUQLwdwMfQQxSm9h3dLT3AADmg0Kmz3aR/IHNp69172uxWXKxACY+uL4ixKUtjDH eL08JRGhJlnTu8b76v1uYFbOfX+fTk+YOpv/aKaegJaU9+ebTWcUpHzbItkdHqHZ WfK//KknkgKOKo4fDZ4ZjtrCdQi7Z4yhV4KyMzXQoJY4U9ZQT8/KKFOGbm68epZX 8DR2PT1XkoG9J/8fP809OdeXn1+IuHTyj4HLvTzjUxhkUj+OMCb7T7Knx9Tmx5fw LmAAtyL2igpdg/HDMPyfC++Gi/bTQQDS0c4o9xTNnzAZlPWf0mVeHKulaAq7r1IW 07aV4OuXXse1fqPeD2DpZkpGGxcRS376Ex20fC9ffpVw918Nif7pV4ptLmqlWvqD HhWZBGqYHolZukWjWSWO0wxmux+u93NvHeMK2eAs6gQNedjFwNWmAW/fDVfhcEdt GDM0q2nNdlaci8FWnWQAh6djD0ty4ueM5G59VlPrHG6WlzT6nZNh7CRc+iBQ9ezf BlKu/RrfsRPPuSg58o5/IY+UWMBZh7cTIVV9da7rz+pwj5/tl0YQt0KEjcGoTWE1 Egbes4SpS7Fa8odMEdfgVkHsvYiCdBnd6yhbPqZXmu+PDjni74FEm9UecsKRLCpe ZbZRocbRmMv5eEKTpoaB =p6fN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VOnbToCuTSVGQGT3-- --===============8198772857001722895== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KVS1Cb290IG1h aWxpbmcgbGlzdApVLUJvb3RAbGlzdHMuZGVueC5kZQpodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLmRlbnguZGUvbGlz dGluZm8vdS1ib290Cg== --===============8198772857001722895==--