From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] support a new rk80x pmic-variants (rk817 and rk809) Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:24:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20190603072400.GD4797@dell> References: <20190508143713.27954-1-heiko@sntech.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190508143713.27954-1-heiko@sntech.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Heiko Stuebner Cc: broonie@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.xie@rock-chips.com, zhangqing@rock-chips.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 08 May 2019, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > I've picked up and rebased Tony's patch-series for rk809 and rk817. > From the last iteration it looks like the regulator-portion did > fall through the cracks, the other patches seem to be sufficiently > reviewed/acked. > > The regulator-patch could either just be picked alone to the regulator- > tree or with an Ack go through the mfd tree with the other patches. > > > Original cover-letter + changelog follows: > > Most of functions and registers of the rk817 and rk808 are the same, > so they can share allmost all codes. > > Their specifications are as follows: > 1) The RK809 and RK809 consist of 5 DCDCs, 9 LDOs and have the same > registers > for these components except dcdc5. > 2) The dcdc5 is a boost dcdc for RK817 and is a buck for RK809. > 3) The RK817 has one switch but The Rk809 has two. Looks like this set is still lacking a Regulator Ack. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog