Re: [PATCH 00/92] ram: rk3399: Add LPDDR4 support

Kever Yang
2019-06-13T01:50:48Z

Hi Jagan,

On 06/11/2019 11:03 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> Note: Puma rk3399 has SPL size overflow, better to enable TPL
>>> for this board.
>> We need to keep Puma on a SPL-only configuration for the time being.
>> Please make sure that the LPDDR4 code is an optional feature that does not
>> increase the DRAM-driver size for boards that don’t need/want it.
> We have few boards do have TPL-runnable, would be any technical issue
> to switch puma to TPL? because we have lpddr4 code part of existing
> driver itself and it require extra ifdef to consider which indeed look
> awful from code point-of-view.
>
Dose the driver size increase too much for Puma because of the lpddr4
init logic or because of the two extra timing data? The two timing data
are pretty big, maybe we do not need them if the board is not lpddr4?

Thanks,
- Kever
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de