Linux-Rockchip Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Peter Geis <pgwipeout-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Maxime Chevallier
	<maxime.chevallier-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Paul Kocialkowski
	<paul.kocialkowski-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni
	<thomas.petazzoni-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Describe PX30 caches
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 16:44:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191204164435.2dd1b4fe@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMdYzYrEmTqvJ6m54EADxLDf70duCtdz3pesV3EZmt67=cbs5g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

Hi Peter,

Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> wrote on Wed, 4 Dec 2019 10:36:19
-0500:

> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 5:40 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > PX30 SoCs feature 4 Cortex-A35 CPUs with each of them a L1 data and
> > instruction cache. Both are 32kiB wide (PX30 TRM) and made of 64-bit
> > lines (ARM Cortex-A35 manual). I-cache is 2-way set associative (ARM
> > Cortex-A35 manual), D-cache is 4-way set associative (ARM
> > Cortex-A35manual).
> >
> > An L2 cache is placed after these 4 L1 caches (PX30 TRM), is 256kiB
> > wide (PX30 TRM) and made of 64-bit lines (ARM Cortex-A35 manual) and
> > is 8-way set associative (ARM Cortex-A35 manual).
> >
> > Describe all of them in the PX30 DTSI.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
> > index 1fd12bd09e83..0e10a224a84b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
> > @@ -48,6 +48,13 @@
> >                         cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP &CLUSTER_SLEEP>;
> >                         dynamic-power-coefficient = <90>;
> >                         operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
> > +                       i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
> > +                       i-cache-line-size = <64>;
> > +                       i-cache-sets = <256>;
> > +                       d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
> > +                       d-cache-line-size = <64>;
> > +                       d-cache-sets = <128>;
> > +                       next-level-cache = <&l2>;  
> 
> If the i-cache is 2-way associative and the d-cache is 4-way, wouldn't
> that mean these two values are backwards?

Which value are you referring to? Do you mean cache-sets? The following
calculation is my understanding of the situation but it is the first
time I am doing it so I might be totally wrong.

My understanding is that if there are 32768 cache bytes made of 64-byte
lines, so there are 512 lines in both cases.

Then, if the instruction cache is 2-way associative, it means there are
512 / 2 = 256 sets. For the data cache (4-way), it would be 512 / 4 =
128. Am I wrong?

Thanks,
Miquèl

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-04 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-04 10:39 [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Describe PX30 caches Miquel Raynal
     [not found] ` <20191204103940.22050-1-miquel.raynal-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2019-12-04 15:36   ` Peter Geis
     [not found]     ` <CAMdYzYrEmTqvJ6m54EADxLDf70duCtdz3pesV3EZmt67=cbs5g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-12-04 15:44       ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2019-12-04 17:14         ` Peter Geis
     [not found]           ` <CAMdYzYoUo_M+qEp3HRsEGrGJDa73JACfH38HG7aY6C8NrQi=5A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-12-04 17:17             ` Miquel Raynal
2019-12-20  0:55   ` Heiko Stübner
2019-12-23  9:03     ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191204164435.2dd1b4fe@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal-ldxbnhwyfcjbdgjk7y7tuq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=maxime.chevallier-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=paul.kocialkowski-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=pgwipeout-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox