From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Kaehlcke Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add brcm bluetooth for rk3288-veyron Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 16:32:01 -0800 Message-ID: <20191210003201.GR228856@google.com> References: <20191127223909.253873-1-abhishekpandit@chromium.org> <20191127223909.253873-2-abhishekpandit@chromium.org> <61639BAF-5AA0-4264-906F-E24E2A30088D@holtmann.org> <1788857.Va9C3Z3akr@diego> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Doug Anderson Cc: Heiko =?utf-8?Q?St=C3=BCbner?= , Marcel Holtmann , Abhishek Pandit-Subedi , BlueZ , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , devicetree , LKML , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Linux ARM List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 03:56:14PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 4:03 PM Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > > Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2019, 00:48:31 CET schrieb Marcel Holtmann: > > > > This enables the Broadcom uart bluetooth driver on uart0 and gives it > > > > ownership of its gpios. In order to use this, you must enable the > > > > following kconfig options: > > > > - CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_BCM > > > > - CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV > > > > > > > > This is applicable to rk3288-veyron series boards that use the bcm43540 > > > > wifi+bt chips. > > > > > > > > As part of this change, also refactor the pinctrl across the various > > > > boards. All the boards using broadcom bluetooth shouldn't touch the > > > > bt_dev_wake pin. > > > > > > so have these changes being merged? > > > > not yet > > > > Doug wanted to give a Reviewed-by, once the underlying bluetooth > > changes got merged - not sure what the status is though. > > I have been out for the last week and am a bit backlogged. > > I notice that this landed in our 4.19 kernel with +Matthias's > Reviewed-by at . I don't feel any need > to re-review this myself if Matthias has taken a final look on it, so > unless he knows a reason why it shouldn't land then I'd say go ahead > and land it. Sorry, should have replied here in the first place. The changes look good to me. Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke