From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Barker Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] pwm: rename the PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED enum Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:34:50 +0000 Message-ID: <20200317133450.58c25bcb@ub1910> References: <20200317123231.2843297-1-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com> <20200317123231.2843297-2-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200317123231.2843297-2-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Oleksandr Suvorov Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Uwe =?UTF-8?B?S2xlaW5lLUvDtm5pZw==?= , Laurent Pinchart , Marcel Ziswiler , Igor Opaniuk , Philippe Schenker , Alexandre Belloni , Chen-Yu Tsai , Claudiu Beznea , Fabio Estevam , Florian Fainelli , Heiko Stuebner , Kevin Hilman , Ludovic Desroches , Maxime Ripard , NXP Linux Team , Nicolas Ferre List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:32:25 +0200 Oleksandr Suvorov wrote: > The polarity enum definition PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED is misspelled. > Rename it to PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED. > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Suvorov Looks good. PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED confused me when I was working in this area recently. After applying to master there's no more instances of PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED in the source tree. Reviewed-by: Paul Barker -- Paul Barker Konsulko Group