From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Dan Johansen <strit@manjaro.org>,
Sandy Huang <hjc@rock-chips.com>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki@radxa.com>,
Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] drm/rockchip: vop: limit maximium resolution to hardware capabilities
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 13:34:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230207123418.GF10447@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547c8e94-f2eb-2125-24fe-0dc035f9d6d2@kwiboo.se>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 10:46:49AM +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
> On 2023-02-07 09:44, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > The different VOP variants support different maximum resolutions. Reject
> > resolutions that are not supported by a specific variant.
> >
> > This hasn't been a problem in the upstream driver so far as 1920x1080
> > has been the maximum resolution supported by the HDMI driver and that
> > resolution is supported by all VOP variants. Now with higher resolutions
> > supported in the HDMI driver we have to limit the resolutions to the
> > ones supported by the VOP.
> >
> > The actual maximum resolutions are taken from the Rockchip downstream
> > Kernel.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> > Changes since v3:
> > - new patch
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c | 15 ++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h | 2 ++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> > index fa1f4ee6d1950..96b6bd8d17803 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> > @@ -1174,6 +1174,20 @@ static void vop_crtc_disable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
> > }
> >
> > +static enum drm_mode_status vop_crtc_mode_valid(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > + const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> > +{
> > + struct vop *vop = to_vop(crtc);
> > +
> > + if (vop->data->max_xres && mode->hdisplay > vop->data->max_xres)
> > + return MODE_BAD_HVALUE;
> > +
> > + if (vop->data->max_yres && mode->vdisplay > vop->data->max_yres)
> > + return MODE_BAD_VVALUE;
> > +
> > + return MODE_OK;
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool vop_crtc_mode_fixup(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> > struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
> > @@ -1585,6 +1599,7 @@ static void vop_crtc_atomic_flush(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > }
> >
> > static const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs vop_crtc_helper_funcs = {
> > + .mode_valid = vop_crtc_mode_valid,
> > .mode_fixup = vop_crtc_mode_fixup,
> > .atomic_check = vop_crtc_atomic_check,
> > .atomic_begin = vop_crtc_atomic_begin,
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h
> > index 8502849833d93..5c4875ca3f270 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h
> > @@ -225,6 +225,8 @@ struct vop_data {
> > const struct vop_win_data *win;
> > unsigned int win_size;
> > unsigned int lut_size;
> > + unsigned int max_xres;
> > + unsigned int max_yres;
>
> I would suggest using the same struct vop_rect max_input/output as the
> vop2 driver instead of handling this differently between the two.
As it was me who introduced struct vop_rect in the vop2 driver I
probably have to agree ;)
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-07 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-07 8:44 [PATCH v4 0/4] drm/rockchip: dw_hdmi: Add 4k@30 support Sascha Hauer
2023-02-07 8:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] drm/rockchip: vop: limit maximium resolution to hardware capabilities Sascha Hauer
2023-02-07 9:16 ` Dan Johansen
2023-02-07 9:40 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-02-07 10:46 ` Jonas Karlman
2023-02-07 12:34 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2023-02-07 8:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/rockchip: dw_hdmi: relax mode_valid hook Sascha Hauer
2023-02-07 8:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/rockchip: dw_hdmi: Add support for 4k@30 resolution Sascha Hauer
2023-02-07 8:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drm/rockchip: dw_hdmi: discard modes with unachievable pixelclocks Sascha Hauer
2023-02-07 11:01 ` Jonas Karlman
2023-02-07 12:51 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-02-07 16:29 ` Jonas Karlman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230207123418.GF10447@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hjc@rock-chips.com \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael.riesch@wolfvision.net \
--cc=naoki@radxa.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=strit@manjaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox