From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70815EB64D8 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 06:05:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=YeiiMznkUbW7IpDP0Fyv9Mzq1f1/5CS4dH18wIuejjQ=; b=X5rLbfQulTYIAY V1DSkPXLmd/XP/pf2yHs+njaTEmkEGEpIC2aN/cq71XF4Z88mKnP30iYynuOHG+IzQjTqLoIP4ar9 Ki/aPk4a5cxjgAvR7GBIeLAInJciM9HDwb34foZxjOwrHeOottt/bCwV9DxwlgdHRj8qIngxmoiMK T0m5PtQngRn9TCbPMZXmb+aEMXXlk0gj1EipNSjo3Nsped2EsR09BZJFseHFeMuu+vSwFfjm8w+54 iZuVR2igC9FSqD7vOvhy8NhRIFgydTi4bg2AFSi+vOtQT+JItgnZywPVDVCE4H6RkW/PQPTaqiuuq o0oZiS2hy0srmiJF5fuA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qA2a8-00Gxr4-1n; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 06:05:12 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qA2a6-00Gxqj-2c for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 06:05:12 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 529E0618D9; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 06:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 151A1C433C0; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 06:05:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1686895509; bh=FzDDNPNYOwo13RD4KhYBHnL5WU5dlJvvuFXByHSyYnI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QHHXl8ijtGPhR5emf8yS4Au9GDHbhkHxznQiyGaj2L1KeQps3CWmEKxoH2qhf2ibH QBHXBi7n+0MNl5MiQW8i98WyNtXr/p1cC5nqoDusWOAE6c6SYF4DsZJ3y4Werw1MEG RjhSiP3gM1xIbJnqgh0Kg9Ev1Qsc4rLPQ2UsHfMM= Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 08:05:07 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Frank Wang Cc: Guenter Roeck , heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, sebastian.reichel@collabora.com, heiko@sntech.de, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, huangtao@rock-chips.com, william.wu@rock-chips.com, jianwei.zheng@rock-chips.com, yubing.zhang@rock-chips.com, wmc@rock-chips.com Subject: Re: usb: typec: tcpm: add get max power support Message-ID: <2023061639-emerald-endorse-2f64@gregkh> References: <20230616022157.25877-1-frank.wang@rock-chips.com> <45886fef-b84a-5704-0a08-100a20296323@rock-chips.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45886fef-b84a-5704-0a08-100a20296323@rock-chips.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230615_230510_912560_B4D537AF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.02 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 11:13:08AM +0800, Frank Wang wrote: > Hi Guenter, > = > On 2023/6/16 10:26, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 6/15/23 19:21, Frank Wang wrote: > > > Traverse fixed pdos to calculate the maximum power that the charger > > > can provide, and it can be got by POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_INPUT_POWER_LIMIT > > > property. > > > = > > = > > Wasn't this already v3 before ? What happened to the version, and the > > change log ? > > Or is this a completely different/new patch ? > > = > = > Yes, it is the v3 patch before which has been hold for a long time, Gregkh > asked me to rebase it=A0 and resubmit, so should I also add an "RESEND" t= ag in > subject? Yes, please do, otherwise we have no idea what is going on here. Please resend v4 with all of the change information. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip