From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Cc: "Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"open list:PCIE DRIVER FOR ROCKCHIP" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:PCIE DRIVER FOR ROCKCHIP"
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] PCI: rockchip: Simplify reset control handling by using reset_control_bulk*() function
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 11:48:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241012061834.ksbtcaw3c7iacnye@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241012050611.1908-3-linux.amoon@gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 10:36:04AM +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> Refactor the reset control handling in the Rockchip PCIe driver,
> introducing a more robust and efficient method for assert and
> deassert reset controller using reset_control_bulk*() API. Using the
> reset_control_bulk APIs, the reset handling for the core clocks reset
> unit becomes much simpler.
>
Same comments as previous patch.
> Spilt the reset controller in two groups as pre the RK3399 TRM.
*per
Also please state the TRM name and section for reference.
> After power up, the software driver should de-assert the reset of PCIe PHY,
> then wait the PLL locked by polling the status, if PLL
> has locked, then can de-assert the reset simultaneously
> driver need to De-assert the reset pins simultionaly.
>
> PIPE_RESET_N/MGMT_STICKY_RESET_N/MGMT_RESET_N/RESET_N.
>
> - replace devm_reset_control_get_exclusive() with
> devm_reset_control_bulk_get_exclusive().
> - replace reset_control_assert with
> reset_control_bulk_assert().
> - replace reset_control_deassert with
> reset_control_bulk_deassert().
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> ---
> v7: replace devm_reset_control_bulk_get_optional_exclusive()
> with devm_reset_control_bulk_get_exclusive()
> update the functional changes.
> V6: Add reason for the split of the RESET pins.
> v5: Fix the De-assert reset core as per the TRM
> De-assert the PIPE_RESET_N/MGMT_STICKY_RESET_N/MGMT_RESET_N/RESET_N
> simultaneously.
> v4: use dev_err_probe in error path.
> v3: Fix typo in commit message, dropped reported by.
> v2: Fix compilation error reported by Intel test robot
> fixed checkpatch warning.
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c | 151 +++++--------------------
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 26 +++--
> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> index 2777ef0cb599..9a118e2b8cbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int rockchip_pcie_parse_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
[...]
> + err = reset_control_bulk_assert(ROCKCHIP_NUM_PM_RSTS,
> + rockchip->pm_rsts);
> + if (err)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "reset bulk assert pm reset\n");
'Couldn't assert PM resets'
>
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_LANE_NUM; i++) {
> err = phy_init(rockchip->phys[i]);
> @@ -173,47 +128,17 @@ int rockchip_pcie_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> }
> }
>
> - err = reset_control_assert(rockchip->core_rst);
> - if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "assert core_rst err %d\n", err);
> - goto err_exit_phy;
> - }
> -
> - err = reset_control_assert(rockchip->mgmt_rst);
> - if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "assert mgmt_rst err %d\n", err);
> - goto err_exit_phy;
> - }
> -
> - err = reset_control_assert(rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst);
> - if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "assert mgmt_sticky_rst err %d\n", err);
> - goto err_exit_phy;
> - }
> -
> - err = reset_control_assert(rockchip->pipe_rst);
> - if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "assert pipe_rst err %d\n", err);
> - goto err_exit_phy;
> - }
> + err = reset_control_bulk_assert(ROCKCHIP_NUM_CORE_RSTS,
> + rockchip->core_rsts);
> + if (err)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "reset bulk assert core reset\n");
'Couldn't assert Core resets'
>
> udelay(10);
>
> - err = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->pm_rst);
> - if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "deassert pm_rst err %d\n", err);
> - goto err_exit_phy;
> - }
> -
> - err = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->aclk_rst);
> + err = reset_control_bulk_deassert(ROCKCHIP_NUM_PM_RSTS,
> + rockchip->pm_rsts);
> if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "deassert aclk_rst err %d\n", err);
> - goto err_exit_phy;
> - }
> -
> - err = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->pclk_rst);
> - if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "deassert pclk_rst err %d\n", err);
> + dev_err(dev, "reset bulk deassert pm err %d\n", err);
'Couldn't deassert PM resets'
> goto err_exit_phy;
> }
>
> @@ -256,31 +181,15 @@ int rockchip_pcie_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> * Please don't reorder the deassert sequence of the following
> * four reset pins.
I don't think my earlier comment on this addressed. Why are you changing the
reset order? Why can't you have the resets in below (older) order?
static const char * const rockchip_pci_core_rsts[] = {
mgmt-sticky",
"core",
"mgmt",
"pipe",
};
Also, this comment should be removed now.
> */
> - err = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst);
> - if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "deassert mgmt_sticky_rst err %d\n", err);
> - goto err_power_off_phy;
> - }
> -
> - err = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->core_rst);
> + err = reset_control_bulk_deassert(ROCKCHIP_NUM_CORE_RSTS,
> + rockchip->core_rsts);
> if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "deassert core_rst err %d\n", err);
> - goto err_power_off_phy;
> - }
> -
> - err = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->mgmt_rst);
> - if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "deassert mgmt_rst err %d\n", err);
> - goto err_power_off_phy;
> - }
> -
> - err = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->pipe_rst);
> - if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "deassert pipe_rst err %d\n", err);
> + dev_err(dev, "reset bulk deassert core err %d\n", err);
'Couldn't deassert Core resets'
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-12 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-12 5:06 [PATCH v7 0/3] PCIe RK3399 clock and reset using new helper functions Anand Moon
2024-10-12 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] PCI: rockchip: Simplify clock handling by using clk_bulk*() function Anand Moon
2024-10-12 6:08 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 7:25 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] PCI: rockchip: Simplify reset control handling by using reset_control_bulk*() function Anand Moon
2024-10-12 6:18 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-10-12 7:25 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 8:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 10:04 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 12:05 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 14:06 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] PCI: rockchip: Refactor rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks() function signature Anand Moon
2024-10-12 6:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 7:25 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 8:02 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 10:04 ` Anand Moon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241012061834.ksbtcaw3c7iacnye@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox