public inbox for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: "Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Laszlo Fiat <laszlo.fiat@proton.me>,
	Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/6] PCI: rockchip-host: Use macro PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_WAIT_MS
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:48:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250613124839.2197945-10-cassel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250613124839.2197945-8-cassel@kernel.org>

Macro PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_WAIT_MS was added to pci.h in commit d5ceb9496c56
("PCI: Add PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_DEVICE_WAIT_MS waiting time value").

Later, in commit 70a7bfb1e515 ("PCI: rockchip-host: Wait 100ms after reset
before starting configuration"), PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS was added to pci.h.

These macros are duplicates, and represent the exact same delay in the
PCIe specification.

Since the comment above PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_WAIT_MS is strictly more correct
than the comment above PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS, change rockchip-host to use
PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_WAIT_MS, and remove PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS, as
rockchip-host is the only user of this macro.

Reviewed-by: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c | 2 +-
 drivers/pci/pci.h                           | 7 -------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
index b9e7a8710cf0..c11ed45c25f6 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
 	msleep(PCIE_T_PVPERL_MS);
 	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(rockchip->perst_gpio, 1);
 
-	msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS);
+	msleep(PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_WAIT_MS);
 
 	/* 500ms timeout value should be enough for Gen1/2 training */
 	err = readl_poll_timeout(rockchip->apb_base + PCIE_CLIENT_BASIC_STATUS1,
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index 98d6fccb383e..819833e57590 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -35,13 +35,6 @@ struct pcie_tlp_log;
  */
 #define PCIE_T_PERST_CLK_US		100
 
-/*
- * End of conventional reset (PERST# de-asserted) to first configuration
- * request (device able to respond with a "Request Retry Status" completion),
- * from PCIe r6.0, sec 6.6.1.
- */
-#define PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS	100
-
 /*
  * PCIe r6.0, sec 5.3.3.2.1 <PME Synchronization>
  * Recommends 1ms to 10ms timeout to check L2 ready.
-- 
2.49.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-13 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-13 12:48 [PATCH v3 0/6] PCI: dwc: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready Niklas Cassel
2025-06-13 12:48 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2025-06-23 14:25   ` [PATCH v3 2/6] PCI: rockchip-host: Use macro PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_WAIT_MS Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-13 12:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] PCI: dw-rockchip: Wait PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_WAIT_MS after link-up IRQ Niklas Cassel
2025-06-23 10:12 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] PCI: dwc: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready Niklas Cassel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250613124839.2197945-10-cassel@kernel.org \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=laszlo.fiat@proton.me \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox