From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
heiko@sntech.de, nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add verisilicon IOMMU driver
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 10:47:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250619134752.GB1643390@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250619131232.69208-4-benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 03:12:24PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> +static struct iommu_domain *vsi_iommu_domain_alloc_paging(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct vsi_iommu *iommu = vsi_iommu_get_from_dev(dev);
> + struct vsi_iommu_domain *vsi_domain;
> +
> + vsi_domain = kzalloc(sizeof(*vsi_domain), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vsi_domain)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + vsi_domain->dma_dev = iommu->dev;
> + iommu->domain = &vsi_identity_domain;
?? alloc paging should not change the iommu.
Probably this belongs in vsi_iommu_probe_device if the device starts
up in an identity translation mode.
> +static u32 *vsi_dte_get_page_table(struct vsi_iommu_domain *vsi_domain, dma_addr_t iova)
> +{
> + u32 *page_table, *dte_addr;
> + u32 dte_index, dte;
> + phys_addr_t pt_phys;
> + dma_addr_t pt_dma;
> +
> + assert_spin_locked(&vsi_domain->dt_lock);
> +
> + dte_index = vsi_iova_dte_index(iova);
> + dte_addr = &vsi_domain->dt[dte_index];
> + dte = *dte_addr;
> + if (vsi_dte_is_pt_valid(dte))
> + goto done;
> +
> + page_table = (u32 *)iommu_alloc_pages_sz(GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA32, SPAGE_SIZE);
Unnecessary casts are not the kernel style, I saw a couple others too
Ugh. This ignores the gfp flags that are passed into map because you
have to force atomic due to the spinlock that shouldn't be there :(
This means it does not set GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT when required. It would
be better to continue to use the passed in GFP flags but override them
to atomic mode.
> +static int vsi_iommu_identity_attach(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct vsi_iommu *iommu = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> + struct vsi_iommu_domain *vsi_domain = to_vsi_domain(domain);
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!iommu))
> + return -ENODEV;
These WARN_ON's should be removed. ops are never called by the core
without a probed device.
> +static int vsi_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct vsi_iommu *iommu = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> + struct vsi_iommu_domain *vsi_domain = to_vsi_domain(domain);
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!iommu))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + /* iommu already attached */
> + if (iommu->domain == domain)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = vsi_iommu_identity_attach(&vsi_identity_domain, dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
Hurm, this is actually quite bad, now that it is clear the HW is in an
identity mode it is actually a security problem for VFIO to switch the
translation to identity during attach_device. I'd really prefer new
drivers don't make this mistake.
It seems the main thing motivating this is the fact a linked list has
only a single iommu->node so you can't attach the iommu to both the
new/old domain and atomically update the page table base.
Is it possible for the HW to do a blocking behavior? That would be an
easy fix.. You should always be able to force this by allocating a
shared top page table level during probe time and making it entirely
empty while staying always in the paging mode. Maybe there is a less
expensive way.
Otherwise you probably have work more like the other drivers and
allocate a struct for each attachment so you can have the iommu
attached two domains during the switch over and never drop to an
identity mode.
> + iommu->domain = domain;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&vsi_domain->iommus_lock, flags);
> + list_add_tail(&iommu->node, &vsi_domain->iommus);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vsi_domain->iommus_lock, flags);
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(iommu->dev);
> + if (!ret || WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0))
> + return 0;
This probably should have a comment, is the idea the resume will setup
the domain? How does locking of iommu->domain work in that case?
Maybe the suspend resume paths should be holding the group mutex..
> + ret = vsi_iommu_enable(iommu);
> + if (ret)
> + WARN_ON(vsi_iommu_identity_attach(&vsi_identity_domain, dev));
Is this necessary though? vsi_iommu_enable failure cases don't change
the HW, and a few lines above was an identity_attach. Just delay
setting iommu->domain until it succeeds, and this is a simple error.
> +static struct iommu_ops vsi_iommu_ops = {
> + .identity_domain = &vsi_identity_domain,
Add:
.release_domain = &vsi_identity_domain,
Which will cause the core code to automatically run through to
vsi_iommu_disable() prior to calling vsi_iommu_release_device(), which
will avoid UAF problems.
Also, should the probe functions be doing some kind of validation that
there is only one struct device attached?
Jason
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-19 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-19 13:12 [PATCH v3 0/5] Add support for Verisilicon IOMMU used by media codec blocks Benjamin Gaignard
2025-06-19 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add Verisilicon Benjamin Gaignard
2025-06-19 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: iommu: verisilicon: Add binding for VSI IOMMU Benjamin Gaignard
2025-06-19 14:19 ` Sebastian Reichel
2025-06-19 15:02 ` Conor Dooley
2025-06-20 9:54 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2025-06-19 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add verisilicon IOMMU driver Benjamin Gaignard
2025-06-19 13:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-06-19 16:27 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2025-06-19 16:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-20 8:57 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2025-06-20 12:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-20 13:52 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2025-06-20 14:42 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2025-06-20 16:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-20 16:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-20 19:37 ` Robin Murphy
2025-06-20 20:45 ` Lucas Stach
2025-06-23 12:05 ` Robin Murphy
2025-06-23 14:03 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2025-06-19 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add verisilicon IOMMU node on RK3588 Benjamin Gaignard
2025-06-19 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: defconfig: enable Verisilicon IOMMU Benjamin Gaignard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250619134752.GB1643390@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox