From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B95B0C83F1A for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:53:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=jSsdAC56smUgGShAkpmDpI48PwUOR8mVo+TVlPUrhWQ=; b=t8MAlzNvrtr0Ue XwRMSQdf1rL7ATaYxweMyCtd6Kssp2tjJaqfBhMlporBIBfUT0nqqgYTyYbv+ok8BYJAJOcMhI3JO 8w4nMq3nLhKhy+KypHRgim7gbK6X7UFNitOH7YPt2B1OmOC+CodO0w7aSaEnTLXvAJKAVlJH5cBTL Nw855Na0PWRiove+5YriFLeaIBV/bxtKxNE8xQeKZJuAELO6nzpssT3r27DRe1K6Q7/dPbASYdsH9 ZM3CVUPK1h9L9kGSzVuVgG+3QH6/SNEmmcEciOscXoGLwRYI6hX3AMBZQp8lODQTOkfEcaLKVCbQ3 osJN8nFWm7DcB4Q/CtRg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uebmC-00000005RO8-207F; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:53:04 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uebjj-00000005QxZ-3Sr7; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:50:33 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1340945A2C; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51412C4CEE7; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:50:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1753285830; bh=q0RdIwl2onvcmCTOyNGzyc8T7XKOzlJKJ3pq4M0YgrQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SmBKNNWav95G3vsgJvAXo6iiufNuKUnjGCOlLlJ6awlSazcT+GVpf/l5k87yZbNFn K3w14Y242PXRz3nw78+h6Bohl6wG5U54VpWGUqdcp902wpdo/m8CZ9QcdbAXqoUkC/ E88MH/T5icJwck0NvRSwhX42ciMp0O4yRqq3ubK7dtAfV0yROA1MpfN0wepLgWQH2p pyIZKgqzA8UmZShrY5ukSSCQS83TLa3qcZKjZhtLj10JUjMMS6eHuhtoAd7S5qsi3k g6OXWs2k+9kN0XPOPyAYmdCVHrVdoerUCnEJG5Zsw9QA9QM5ruBrYV7+OvfkZZJipn G9io2fsDkj9ZA== Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:50:21 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Jonas Karlman Cc: Heiko Stuebner , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , David Lechner , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , Andy Shevchenko , Yao Zi , Chukun Pan , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: iio: adc: rockchip-saradc: Allow use of a power-domain Message-ID: <20250723165021.4e2dd324@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <20250723085654.2273324-4-jonas@kwiboo.se> References: <20250723085654.2273324-1-jonas@kwiboo.se> <20250723085654.2273324-4-jonas@kwiboo.se> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.49; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250723_085031_897929_2892CC12 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.76 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:56:45 +0000 Jonas Karlman wrote: > The SARADC controller in most Rockchip SoCs are part of power domains > that are always powered on, i.e. PD_BUS or PD_PERI. These always powered > on power domains have typically not been described in the device tree. > > Because these power domains have been left out of the device tree there > has not been any real need to properly describe the power domain of the > SARADC controller. > > On RK3528 the SARADC controller is part of the PD_VPU power domain. > > Add support to describe an optional power-domains for the SARADC > controller in Rockchip SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman Applied to the testing branch of iio.git. I'll be rebasing on rc1 once available. Thanks, Jonathan > --- > v2: Update commit message > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml > index 41e0c56ef8e3..f776041fd08f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml > @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ properties: > - const: saradc > - const: apb_pclk > > + power-domains: > + maxItems: 1 > + > resets: > maxItems: 1 > _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip