From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5AD0D2FED9 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:38:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=3VPuspGv3T22wA8jeRBc+mtHxXnKKy0PFZxib3Vepro=; b=3/aix9UOKksBAt T9NjxbfKIaseJ2rrZhvTIq0ChkChsaPJICRh7BU8c4vvBuIILS/6vjfHDaXgp1Pa/oLk9Gy7SicDP 0WBhOQsrRCJZ/WiCKk9uwwMcE2EMRE0um/I5R2xi2vAm7Vgz3Cxyl0lUpJvkugbkMrNpsE+51lMjy OXGbF0kfRhCkPj3PvhA4+V1Liuc2P/alb38LogRm/2+bRcVfJqNqlaLozW/uTrVqO/b/xbMK0L6fv sJE8rd0hwLR9D/sM68lqzhL2WtPcN7QjY/AbdJ5iI2pfn7iWVoajWe9Up6KUjKKNqMoxGfAtiCpAF aQpJjN8woUroBtwwGA/g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vknxS-0000000EpjU-2wTI; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:38:34 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vknxM-0000000EphQ-1fju; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:38:29 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A184E40A65; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2020C116C6; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:38:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769539107; bh=xnxW/CWgie/RiC6ceA36oB6xfFtPTb0OHKlujCG/RnU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R5np0NK2ji0Bvsl4dkcDUf6Xv2tMqnpoJLp4Su5Tlndt1VH/kgo9IUEOMlFv3g9hf NWV0vMSiUt0Ty/+U6OkCTNW7gPzsWU9IOwm4NP/q5gZJ4Esj35k51DOxS3iV4/uDUI r0/gFI1VqGmeoEIcPLpLYMl6CMlt+j3gVMklN0OPTIDr57Yo8dQ/9w49avkrhqjMWe XNqSSCWoK8aqFKZcnqXAHKFmUxbuT0758wx7jjFn63jK8Ko/tcSEWTYyh9Lj4B0l5P lEjH0UyOmDHgFdhCsYpefGH9u4MZh4NhGRVvU6hty2mnsoQtj4rt0oK0ZJsPNFyc0I aQrFGI9h1BMXQ== Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:38:25 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, heiko@sntech.de, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com Subject: Re: [net-next,v2,06/22] net: stmmac: rk: add SoC specific ->init() method Message-ID: <20260127103825.7fcc86e3@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260127004020.3785641-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20260127081804.64841f65@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260127_103828_477159_8364244A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.07 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:42:05 +0000 Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > If I'm going to have to split it up just for the sake of reducing the > cost of AI review, Incorrect, as previously stated do not worry about the cost. I was citing the cost as the reason we can't give people open access to the AI bot. > can I ask for a moritorium on other development changes to dwmac-rk > until this is merged? Seems reasonable, as long as you're posting and making active progress we can prioritize merging this work. > As I see it, this is required _because_ of the introduction of AI > review, not because something has actually changed. Can't argue with how you feel. > You have said in the past to me that the 15 patch limit is only > advisory and can be exceeded where it makes sense to, and for this > series, it does make sense. Advisory is too weak. Unless there's a strong reason not to break up the series it should be under 15 patches. This conversation doesn't feel very productive. Let me just apply patches 1-4 and move on :| _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip