From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16378FA0C43 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:10:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=mReTPXbZtHMYUCBmEcUXF6BCmY+4zP2jI5P6BMtZfzQ=; b=NgYuHKRNyCnf1l kDF0QwTOiMU2gJdiTU5kv78/E31bGrgTSY00meEwfBdu/Uen/RRpZPVpoJyqzFL9JMuvyi4L4k3N5 ULLN5JtbeYIVFJTlG0S3QHK+bAzUbdP/psAjT08Skc/pbwWcbmropTpZ9llB/cCap1Olz1/9+pfIN dI5UISGfQ44J4TidJOtI9kr+X1sPThqiukAvk6WpTAgBHdk5OO36kzgbW79PlOLsVX95fI53bpjvu DQz9vXWOiecfTF7H3iTz82hUhiU5amOAw4rJ93tik4jNQZtNY36gCFolL95g9Jzz75YTvU1RhG5Nk fZSG61knG2hOMF1A4C2g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wCvKH-00000000mNO-3yNJ; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:10:21 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wCvKE-00000000mME-3Q0A; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:10:19 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800DA42E03; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D051FC19424; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:10:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1776240618; bh=I6eUDp4wTRJP5CSONuLda4AnlkaTkRvF/XhtVGrCOXs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=f3DLZyu8wclWP9+9yOvpttjvy+zqfD0qAV5MaRuHF9J1O8UwpI4uWV8qnSug3lX2w kPQIXfMqwh36ZO2coLxi2u6jRokNlRwhoEwAxIQ15NumsflWfytZ3O539wqYHLzMQA apBR8Lwl79DV7n4k8/SBFS0ue3GMZb37+qDKGA01GPmaAFRWVRzs3uQc3btQXZxhA3 ThI3/I4JeR0GjzCPzyqH4sux85UmwK5LBii9LgahjwUtlHT6VDEM7htJ6/cx+I/+OC 4TME98PO+5p1Gb9I01x3Ml1A3UkufM50/TCZv9NuvJKtz8NpIOJhPpoDOEVtOPp1ex lz01AVaghKcuQ== Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 10:10:16 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Guoniu Zhou Cc: Michael Riesch , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Laurent Pinchart , Frank Li , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] media: dt-bindings: add NXP i.MX95 compatible string Message-ID: <20260415-glaring-premium-nuthatch-ce00fc@quoll> References: <20260415-csi2_imx95-v1-0-7d63f3508719@oss.nxp.com> <20260415-csi2_imx95-v1-4-7d63f3508719@oss.nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260415-csi2_imx95-v1-4-7d63f3508719@oss.nxp.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260415_011018_873017_CE1C12D2 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.60 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 11:46:55AM +0800, Guoniu Zhou wrote: > The i.MX95 CSI-2 controller is nearly identical to i.MX93, with the > only difference being the use of IDI (Image Data Interface) instead > of IPI (Image Pixel Interface). The binding constraints are otherwise > the same. Nearly identical with some difference really, really suggests they are compatible. Express compatibility or explain why they are not compatible (difference between IDI and IPI unfortunately does not help me). Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip