Linux-Rockchip Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>,
	Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Sidong Yang <sidong.yang@furiosa.ai>,
	Diederik de Haas <diederik@cknow-tech.com>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
	Jiaxing Hu <gahing@gahingwoo.com>,
	Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@ndufresne.ca>,
	Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: allow DVFS and thermal properties
Date: Fri,  4 Sep 2026 15:08:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904130858.27803-3-royalnet026@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904130858.27803-1-royalnet026@gmail.com>

The three NPU cores on the RK3588 are fed by a single clock and a single
supply, and the firmware accepts a fixed set of rates for that clock.
Describing those rates as an operating-points-v2 table is what lets a
driver scale the NPU instead of leaving it at whatever rate the bootloader
set, so allow the property on the core node.

Throttling the NPU from a thermal zone needs the same node to be usable as
a cooling device, so allow #cooling-cells too.

Both properties belong on the core that carries the shared clock, not on
all three: the cores have no clock of their own and cannot be scaled or
throttled independently. Naming one representative node for a shared
frequency domain is the established shape, as in "Cpufreq cooling device
on CPU0" in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-cooling-devices.yaml.

The schema cannot enforce that placement, because all three cores share a
compatible string and a node name pattern, so which core carries them
stays a devicetree convention. That is the same situation as for CPU
cooling, where cpus.yaml does not restrict #cooling-cells to cpu@0 either.

The example gains #cooling-cells; the operating-points-v2 property is
exercised by the RK3588 devicetree later in this series.

Signed-off-by: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
Assisted-by: LLM checkpatch dt_binding_check
---
 .../bindings/npu/rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core.yaml        | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/npu/rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/npu/rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core.yaml
index caca2a4903cd1..595aacfbf8608 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/npu/rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/npu/rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core.yaml
@@ -42,6 +42,13 @@ properties:
       - const: npu
       - const: pclk
 
+  "#cooling-cells":
+    description:
+      Present on the core that drives the shared NPU clock, which is the one
+      the operating-points-v2 table below is attached to. The other cores
+      cannot be throttled independently of it.
+    const: 2
+
   interrupts:
     maxItems: 1
 
@@ -50,6 +57,8 @@ properties:
 
   npu-supply: true
 
+  operating-points-v2: true
+
   power-domains:
     maxItems: 1
 
@@ -100,6 +109,7 @@ examples:
         clocks = <&cru ACLK_NPU0>, <&cru HCLK_NPU0>,
                  <&scmi_clk SCMI_CLK_NPU>, <&cru PCLK_NPU_ROOT>;
         clock-names = "aclk", "hclk", "npu", "pclk";
+        #cooling-cells = <2>;
         interrupts = <GIC_SPI 110 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
         iommus = <&rknn_mmu_0>;
         npu-supply = <&vdd_npu_s0>;
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-04 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-04 13:08 [PATCH 0/7] accel/rocket: DVFS for the RK3588 NPU Igor Paunovic
2026-09-04 13:08 ` [PATCH 1/7] accel/rocket: request the core clocks by name Igor Paunovic
2026-09-04 13:08 ` Igor Paunovic [this message]
2026-09-04 15:11   ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: allow DVFS and thermal properties Conor Dooley
2026-09-04 13:08 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588: add an OPP table for the NPU Igor Paunovic
2026-09-04 13:08 ` [PATCH 4/7] accel/rocket: restore the NPU clock boot rate before powering the cores down Igor Paunovic
2026-09-04 13:08 ` [PATCH 5/7] accel/rocket: add devfreq support Igor Paunovic
2026-09-04 13:08 ` [PATCH 6/7] accel/rocket: register a devfreq cooling device Igor Paunovic
2026-09-04 13:08 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588: add passive cooling to the NPU thermal zone Igor Paunovic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260904130858.27803-3-royalnet026@gmail.com \
    --to=royalnet026@gmail.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gahing@gahingwoo.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nicolas@ndufresne.ca \
    --cc=ogabbay@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    --cc=sidong.yang@furiosa.ai \
    --cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox