Re: Boundary between pinctrl and peripheral settings

[Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>]

Hi David,

Am Freitag, 21. Juli 2017, 14:33:00 CEST schrieb David.Wu:
> Unfortunately, after the discussion with IC, we feel that we can not 
> make hardware automatic switch;
> The reason for this is that if you accidentally configure all of these 
> configurations, the hardware doesn't know which one to choose, and then 
> it's not good for our debug, because I don't know which option the 
> current hardware is switching to.

I guess we can live with the routing solution, as it looks manageable :-) .

> So we still maintain the current way, but ask them to write more clearly 
> and easily in the TRM file.

Ok ... maybe also try to keep them from being overly creative with the
routing options (the rk3328 mac pins had these strange states, where
we were lucky that some of them were just not usable).


Heiko



> 在 2017/5/23 0:29, Heiko Stuebner 写道:
> > I was talking with David Wu about that a short while ago as well:-)  .
> > 
> >   From what I've heared, in the future socs may be able to select that
> > routing themselfs based on the iomux and having had time to ponder
> > the whole issue for some time now, I do guess some sort of list would be
> > the least intrusive solution.
> 
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip