From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] power-domain: allow domains only handling idle requests Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:09:43 +0200 Message-ID: <2362699.UXTOZsAcz0@diego> References: <1457558578-22049-1-git-send-email-zhangqing@rock-chips.com> <1457558578-22049-3-git-send-email-zhangqing@rock-chips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1457558578-22049-3-git-send-email-zhangqing@rock-chips.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Elaine Zhang Cc: khilman@baylibre.com, xf@rock-chips.com, wxt@rock-chips.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, huangtao@rock-chips.com, zyw@rock-chips.com, xxx@rock-chips.com, jay.xu@rock-chips.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org Am Donnerstag, 10. M=E4rz 2016, 05:22:54 schrieb Elaine Zhang: > On some Rockchip SoC there exist child-domains only handling their > idle state with the actual power-state handled by a parent-domain. >=20 > So allow such types of domains. For them, we can determine their > state (on/of) by checking the inverse idle-state instead. >=20 > There exist one special case if both idle as well power handling > were set as not present, but as the domain-data is defined in the > code itself, we can expect the reasonable developer to define them >=20 > So allow such types of domains. For them, we can determine their > state (on/of) by checking the inverse idle-state instead. >=20 > There exist one special case if both idle as well power handling > were set as not present, but as the domain-data is defined in the > code itself, we can expect the reasonable developer to define them > in a correct, without adding more checks. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang applied to my armsoc/drivers branch for 4.7 Thanks Heiko