From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA8D8ECAAD8 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:26:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=aPucW9A4wTHs4pqSQWkp2/C8xM1QHNepWLwebu+zNZ4=; b=WmaQfTyn/G0uGo 87NVwo6s1gUXTXVMjGo6KpUqOS9eRvgquWU2hvOWa2ju957F+/oapAtipSbNxLGkNwvFLVRFM8b/1 aXuOAcpbk6Bc5zHuzHT4HKHycNnnSyM6PUaUyHtsV1f/lliPoMXvspKlhKDwjxRGr5ezVH7UlDwf3 cSdKFRcjHpz0KIkY8GfApp7R44qdbC9V2coXoikqeTA/W6jLzBmdcGrvZje03ydxrOP5EFJ5GZyGu 95hexAo9wjVcNtOSaiB8tIl/ThwhfBk5eUvGVPRTx8dK5aPtwHl6FShxPnfBs7uzTmwxdSmKeko74 flUrshDBg4cDLPH/VLgQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1obft2-003dQ5-13; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:26:24 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1obfsy-003dPI-U4 for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:26:22 +0000 Received: from p508fdb48.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.143.219.72] helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1obfsp-0005pO-T2; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 12:26:11 +0200 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Jianqun Xu , Linus Walleij Cc: jbx6244@gmail.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, brgl@bgdev.pl, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 0/2] rockchip pinctrl for acpi Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 12:26:06 +0200 Message-ID: <2419940.Icojqenx9y@phil> In-Reply-To: References: <20220917060929.657778-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220923_032620_993997_C065DD84 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.69 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Dienstag, 20. September 2022, 11:26:26 CEST schrieb Linus Walleij: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 8:09 AM Jianqun Xu wrote: > > > These patch fixes to support acpi by: > > 1. populate gpio platform before pinctrl to probe > > 2. get gpiochip by finding from gpiochip list > > 3. get match data by device api > > > > Jianqun Xu (2): > > pinctrl: rockchip: find gpiochip by name from gpio module > > pinctrl: rockchip: get match data by device_get_match_data > > These look OK to me but I would feel better if Heiko or Andy ACK:ed > them so I give them a few more days to comment. Right now I'm actually quite confused as I seem to have a bunch of pinctrl/gpio-acpi patchsets of varying lengths in my inbox. There is a "v2", a "v8", a 20-patchset without version. It's all quite confusing. Heiko _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip