From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>
Cc: tfiga@chromium.org, hverkuil@xs4all.nl,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, helen.koike@collabora.com,
christoph.muellner@theobroma-systems.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
ezequiel@collabora.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] media: rockchip: rkisp1: carry ip version information
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:21:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2673307.AiC22s8V5E@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f67aadb1-0965-e2eb-6b50-842e548e0043@collabora.com>
Hi Dafna,
Am Montag, 18. Januar 2021, 10:19:41 CET schrieb Dafna Hirschfeld:
> Am 15.01.21 um 21:29 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> > Am Freitag, 15. Januar 2021, 20:42:41 CET schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 05:38:28PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> >>> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
> >>>
> >>> The IP block evolved from its rk3288/rk3399 base and the vendor
> >>> designates them with a numerical version. rk3399 for example
> >>> is designated V10 probably meaning V1.0.
> >>>
> >>> There doesn't seem to be an actual version register we could read that
> >>> information from, so allow the match_data to carry that information
> >>> for future differentiation.
> >>>
> >>> Also carry that information in the hw_revision field of the media-
> >>> controller API, so that userspace also has access to that.
> >>>
> >>> The added versions are:
> >>> - V10: at least rk3288 + rk3399
> >>> - V11: seemingly unused as of now, but probably appeared in some soc
> >>> - V12: at least rk3326 + px30
> >>> - V13: at least rk1808
> >>
> >> In addition to changes to the ISP itself, are there changes in how it is
> >> integrated in the system, in particular in how it is connected to CSI-2
> >> receivers ?
> >
> > Hooking up my camera on the px30 was pretty straightforward.
> > As you can see in [0] the actual csi-phy block is different, but structurally
> > everything else stayed the same and the px30 series merely accounts
> > for some isp-specific changes, like the split interrupts and the V12-specific
> > parts.
> >
> >
> >> Do all the above SoCs have two ISP instances ?
> >
> > Nope, I think only the rk3399 has two ISPs.
> >
> > All others only seem to have one instance and maybe an additional more
> > simple video input processor. (like the rk3288 has both an ISP and something
> > called VIP - a simpler block)
> >
> > Similar is the rk3326/px30 (same soc) which has an ISP as well as a VIP that
> > Maxime Chevallier is working on [1]
> >
> > Heiko
> >
> > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20210108193311.3423236-1-heiko@sntech.de/
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20201229161724.511102-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com/
> >
> >
> >>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> Documentation/admin-guide/media/rkisp1.rst | 16 ++++++++++++++
> >>> .../platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c | 21 +++++++++++--------
> >>> include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h | 16 ++++++++++++++
> >>> 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/media/rkisp1.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/media/rkisp1.rst
> >>> index 2267e4fb475e..ccf418713623 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/media/rkisp1.rst
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/media/rkisp1.rst
> >>> @@ -13,6 +13,22 @@ This file documents the driver for the Rockchip ISP1 that is part of RK3288
> >>> and RK3399 SoCs. The driver is located under drivers/staging/media/rkisp1
> >>> and uses the Media-Controller API.
> >>>
> >>> +Revisions
> >>> +=========
> >>> +
> >>> +There exist multiple smaller revisions to this ISP that got introduced in
> >>> +later SoCs. Revisions can be found in the enum :c:type:`rkisp1_cif_isp_version`
> >>> +in the UAPI and the revision of the ISP inside the running SoC can be read
> >>> +in the field hw_revision of struct media_device_info as returned by
> >>> +ioctl MEDIA_IOC_DEVICE_INFO.
> >>> +
> >>> +Versions in use are:
> >>> +
> >>> +- RKISP1_V10: used at least in rk3288 and rk3399
> >>> +- RKISP1_V11: declared in the original vendor code, but not used
> >>> +- RKISP1_V12: used at least in rk3326 and px30
> >>> +- RKISP1_V13: used at least in rk1808
> >>> +
> >>> Topology
> >>> ========
> >>> .. _rkisp1_topology_graph:
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c
> >>> index 68da1eed753d..f7e9fd305548 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c
> >>> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@
> >>> struct rkisp1_match_data {
> >>> const char * const *clks;
> >>> unsigned int size;
> >>> + enum rkisp1_cif_isp_version isp_ver;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> /* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> @@ -411,15 +412,16 @@ static const char * const rk3399_isp_clks[] = {
> >>> "hclk",
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> -static const struct rkisp1_match_data rk3399_isp_clk_data = {
> >>> +static const struct rkisp1_match_data rk3399_isp_match_data = {
> >>> .clks = rk3399_isp_clks,
> >>> .size = ARRAY_SIZE(rk3399_isp_clks),
> >>> + .isp_ver = RKISP1_V10,
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> static const struct of_device_id rkisp1_of_match[] = {
> >>> {
> >>> .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-cif-isp",
> >>> - .data = &rk3399_isp_clk_data,
> >>> + .data = &rk3399_isp_match_data,
> >>> },
> >>> {},
> >>> };
> >>> @@ -457,15 +459,15 @@ static void rkisp1_debug_init(struct rkisp1_device *rkisp1)
> >>>
> >>> static int rkisp1_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>> {
> >>> - const struct rkisp1_match_data *clk_data;
> >>> + const struct rkisp1_match_data *match_data;
> >>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >>> struct rkisp1_device *rkisp1;
> >>> struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev;
> >>> unsigned int i;
> >>> int ret, irq;
> >>>
> >>> - clk_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> >>> - if (!clk_data)
> >>> + match_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> >>> + if (!match_data)
> >>> return -ENODEV;
> >>>
> >>> rkisp1 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rkisp1), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> @@ -494,15 +496,16 @@ static int rkisp1_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>
> >>> rkisp1->irq = irq;
> >>>
> >>> - for (i = 0; i < clk_data->size; i++)
> >>> - rkisp1->clks[i].id = clk_data->clks[i];
> >>> - ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, clk_data->size, rkisp1->clks);
> >>> + for (i = 0; i < match_data->size; i++)
> >>> + rkisp1->clks[i].id = match_data->clks[i];
> >>> + ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, match_data->size, rkisp1->clks);
> >>> if (ret)
> >>> return ret;
> >>> - rkisp1->clk_size = clk_data->size;
> >>> + rkisp1->clk_size = match_data->size;
> >>>
> >>> pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> >>>
> >>> + rkisp1->media_dev.hw_revision = match_data->isp_ver;
> >>> strscpy(rkisp1->media_dev.model, RKISP1_DRIVER_NAME,
> >>> sizeof(rkisp1->media_dev.model));
> >>> rkisp1->media_dev.dev = &pdev->dev;
> >>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h b/include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h
> >>> index ba443771cc0b..9fecb6bc457d 100644
> >>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h
> >>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h
> >>> @@ -124,6 +124,22 @@
> >>> #define RKISP1_CIF_ISP_STAT_AFM (1U << 2)
> >>> #define RKISP1_CIF_ISP_STAT_HIST (1U << 3)
> >>>
> >>> +
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * enum rkisp1_cif_isp_version - ISP variants
> >>> + *
> >>> + * @RKISP1_V10: used at least in rk3288 and rk3399
> >>> + * @RKISP1_V11: declared in the original vendor code, but not used
> >>> + * @RKISP1_V12: used at least in rk3326 and px30
> >>> + * @RKISP1_V13: used at least in rk1808
> >>> + */
> >>> +enum rkisp1_cif_isp_version {
> >>> + RKISP1_V10 = 0,
>
> I wonder if it is useful to start the enum with:
> RKISP1_V10 = 10,
>
> So when printing the hw revision it always prints a positive number.
makes sense ... also if userspace prints the value somewhere, it's
readable without knowing the constants - will change with the v5
I'm preparing.
Heiko
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-18 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-15 16:38 [PATCH v4 0/3] Fix the rkisp1 userspace API for later IP versions Heiko Stuebner
2021-01-15 16:38 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] media: rockchip: rkisp1: fix comment about number of histogram sub-windows Heiko Stuebner
2021-01-15 16:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] media: rockchip: rkisp1: carry ip version information Heiko Stuebner
2021-01-15 19:42 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-01-15 20:29 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-01-18 9:19 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-01-18 9:21 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2021-01-18 9:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-01-15 16:38 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] media: rockchip: rkisp1: extend uapi array sizes Heiko Stuebner
2021-01-15 17:41 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-01-15 23:52 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-01-16 9:05 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-01-16 11:57 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-01-16 13:34 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2673307.AiC22s8V5E@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=christoph.muellner@theobroma-systems.com \
--cc=dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com \
--cc=ezequiel@collabora.com \
--cc=helen.koike@collabora.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox