From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Stuebner Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rock960: Enable tsadc device Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:34:16 +0100 Message-ID: <3185590.aYss3V9hle@phil> References: <20190215152539.16606-1-ezequiel@collabora.com> <4625663.tZDl4lH1EQ@diego> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+glpar-linux-rockchip=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: Ezequiel Garcia Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra , linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, kernel-ZGY8ohtN/8qB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Manivannan Sadhasivam List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org Am Samstag, 16. Februar 2019, 03:55:01 CET schrieb Ezequiel Garcia: > On Sat, 2019-02-16 at 00:14 +0100, Heiko St=FCbner wrote: > > Hi Ezequiel, > > = > > Am Freitag, 15. Februar 2019, 16:25:39 CET schrieb Ezequiel Garcia: > > > Enable the thermal sensor. This device also provides > > > temperature shutdown protection. The shutdown value is > > > set at 110C, as tested by the vendor. > > > = > > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi | 7 +++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > = > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi index > > > d64d5ac0804a..599c9752ed4d 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi > > > @@ -634,3 +634,10 @@ > > > mali-supply =3D <&vdd_gpu>; > > > status =3D "okay"; > > > }; > > = > > doesn't apply against my 5.1/dts64 branch and our rock960.dtsi > > also does not have a mali node yet (especially also not one with > > space-indentation ;-) ). > > = > > = > = > Sorry about that, it was based on your for-next branch, > but a mali patch slipped through. I've fixed that up now and applied the fixed version for 5.1. I've also moved the &tsadc to the correct position - alphabetically between sdmmc and uart0. Please keep sorting in mind for future additions ;-) . Thanks Heiko