public inbox for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
Cc: Daniele Castagna <dcastagna@chromium.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/rockchip: Fix YUV buffers color rendering
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 14:26:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3215325.nePTtMV2FM@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181214162920.20361-1-ezequiel@collabora.com>

Hi,

sorry, only now got to test this on actual hardware,

Am Freitag, 14. Dezember 2018, 17:29:20 CET schrieb Ezequiel Garcia:
> From: Daniele Castagna <dcastagna@chromium.org>
> 
> Currently, YUV hardware overlays are converted to RGB using
> a color space conversion different than BT.601.
> 
> The result is that colors of e.g. NV12 buffers don't match
> colors of YUV hardware overlays.
> 
> In order to fix this, enable YUV2YUV and set appropriate coefficients
> for formats such as NV12 to be displayed correctly.
> 
> This commit was tested using modetest, gstreamer and chromeos (hardware
> accelerated video playback). Before the commit, tests rendering
> with NV12 format resulted in colors not displayed correctly.
> 
> Test examples (RK3399 Ficus board connected to HDMI monitor):
> 
>   $ modetest 39@32:1920x1080@NV12
>   $ gst-launch-1.0 videotestrc ! video/x-raw,format=NV12 ! kmssink
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Castagna <dcastagna@chromium.org>
> [ezequiel: rebase on linux-next and massage commit log]
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
> ---
> v2:
>   * Addressed feedback from Sean Paul
>   * Rebased on linux-next
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h | 13 +++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> index fb70fb486fbf..78c7f63a60c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,18 @@
>  		vop_reg_set(vop, &win->phy->scl->ext->name, \
>  			    win->base, ~0, v, #name)
>  
> +#define VOP_WIN_YUV2YUV_SET(x, win_yuv2yuv, name, v) \
> +	do { \
> +		if (win_yuv2yuv->name.mask) \
> +			vop_reg_set(vop, &win_yuv2yuv->name, 0, ~0, v, #name); \
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +#define VOP_WIN_YUV2YUV_COEFFICIENT_SET(x, win_yuv2yuv, name, v) \
> +	do { \
> +		if (win_yuv2yuv->phy->name.mask) \
> +			vop_reg_set(vop, &win_yuv2yuv->phy->name, win_yuv2yuv->base, ~0, v, #name); \
> +	} while (0)
> +

While this seems to work on rk3399, it hangs both my rk3328 (rock64)
and rk3288 (google-pinky) during rockchip-drm probe.

Making this something like

	if (win_yuv2yuv && win_yuv2yuv->phy->name.mask) \

aka testing for existence of win_yuv2yuv first, makes them boot again,
so I guess I ran into a (for whatever reason) silent null-ptr-dereference.


> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
> index 08fc40af52c8..fe752df4e038 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
> @@ -637,6 +637,34 @@ static const struct vop_output rk3399_output = {
>  	.mipi_dual_channel_en = VOP_REG(RK3288_SYS_CTRL, 0x1, 3),
>  };
>  
> +static const struct vop_yuv2yuv_phy rk3399_yuv2yuv_win01_data = {
> +	.y2r_coefficients = {
> +		VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 0, 0xffff, 0),
> +		VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 0, 0xffff, 16),
> +		VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 4, 0xffff, 0),
> +		VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 4, 0xffff, 16),
> +		VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 8, 0xffff, 0),
> +		VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 8, 0xffff, 16),
> +		VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 12, 0xffff, 0),
> +		VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 12, 0xffff, 16),
> +		VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 16, 0xffff, 0),
> +		VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 20, 0xffffffff, 0),
> +		VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 24, 0xffffffff, 0),
> +		VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 28, 0xffffffff, 0),
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static const struct vop_yuv2yuv_phy rk3399_yuv2yuv_win23_data = { };

looking at the rk3399 TRM it seems that win2+3 also have yuv2rgb
coefficient registers. I didn't check in depth but are they so different
that they cannot be supported?

Aka what is the difference between win0/1 and win2/3 ?


Heiko


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-07 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20180215053300.70482-2-dcastagna@chromium.org>
2018-12-14 16:29 ` [PATCH v2] drm/rockchip: Fix YUV buffers color rendering Ezequiel Garcia
2019-01-03 16:28   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2019-01-07 13:26   ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2019-01-07 20:07     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2019-01-08 17:17       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2019-01-08 21:46   ` [PATCH v3] " Ezequiel Garcia
2019-01-10 22:55     ` Heiko Stuebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3215325.nePTtMV2FM@phil \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=dcastagna@chromium.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ezequiel@collabora.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox