From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
Cc: Daniele Castagna <dcastagna@chromium.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/rockchip: Fix YUV buffers color rendering
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 14:26:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3215325.nePTtMV2FM@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181214162920.20361-1-ezequiel@collabora.com>
Hi,
sorry, only now got to test this on actual hardware,
Am Freitag, 14. Dezember 2018, 17:29:20 CET schrieb Ezequiel Garcia:
> From: Daniele Castagna <dcastagna@chromium.org>
>
> Currently, YUV hardware overlays are converted to RGB using
> a color space conversion different than BT.601.
>
> The result is that colors of e.g. NV12 buffers don't match
> colors of YUV hardware overlays.
>
> In order to fix this, enable YUV2YUV and set appropriate coefficients
> for formats such as NV12 to be displayed correctly.
>
> This commit was tested using modetest, gstreamer and chromeos (hardware
> accelerated video playback). Before the commit, tests rendering
> with NV12 format resulted in colors not displayed correctly.
>
> Test examples (RK3399 Ficus board connected to HDMI monitor):
>
> $ modetest 39@32:1920x1080@NV12
> $ gst-launch-1.0 videotestrc ! video/x-raw,format=NV12 ! kmssink
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Castagna <dcastagna@chromium.org>
> [ezequiel: rebase on linux-next and massage commit log]
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * Addressed feedback from Sean Paul
> * Rebased on linux-next
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h | 13 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> index fb70fb486fbf..78c7f63a60c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,18 @@
> vop_reg_set(vop, &win->phy->scl->ext->name, \
> win->base, ~0, v, #name)
>
> +#define VOP_WIN_YUV2YUV_SET(x, win_yuv2yuv, name, v) \
> + do { \
> + if (win_yuv2yuv->name.mask) \
> + vop_reg_set(vop, &win_yuv2yuv->name, 0, ~0, v, #name); \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +#define VOP_WIN_YUV2YUV_COEFFICIENT_SET(x, win_yuv2yuv, name, v) \
> + do { \
> + if (win_yuv2yuv->phy->name.mask) \
> + vop_reg_set(vop, &win_yuv2yuv->phy->name, win_yuv2yuv->base, ~0, v, #name); \
> + } while (0)
> +
While this seems to work on rk3399, it hangs both my rk3328 (rock64)
and rk3288 (google-pinky) during rockchip-drm probe.
Making this something like
if (win_yuv2yuv && win_yuv2yuv->phy->name.mask) \
aka testing for existence of win_yuv2yuv first, makes them boot again,
so I guess I ran into a (for whatever reason) silent null-ptr-dereference.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
> index 08fc40af52c8..fe752df4e038 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
> @@ -637,6 +637,34 @@ static const struct vop_output rk3399_output = {
> .mipi_dual_channel_en = VOP_REG(RK3288_SYS_CTRL, 0x1, 3),
> };
>
> +static const struct vop_yuv2yuv_phy rk3399_yuv2yuv_win01_data = {
> + .y2r_coefficients = {
> + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 0, 0xffff, 0),
> + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 0, 0xffff, 16),
> + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 4, 0xffff, 0),
> + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 4, 0xffff, 16),
> + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 8, 0xffff, 0),
> + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 8, 0xffff, 16),
> + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 12, 0xffff, 0),
> + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 12, 0xffff, 16),
> + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 16, 0xffff, 0),
> + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 20, 0xffffffff, 0),
> + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 24, 0xffffffff, 0),
> + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 28, 0xffffffff, 0),
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct vop_yuv2yuv_phy rk3399_yuv2yuv_win23_data = { };
looking at the rk3399 TRM it seems that win2+3 also have yuv2rgb
coefficient registers. I didn't check in depth but are they so different
that they cannot be supported?
Aka what is the difference between win0/1 and win2/3 ?
Heiko
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-07 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20180215053300.70482-2-dcastagna@chromium.org>
2018-12-14 16:29 ` [PATCH v2] drm/rockchip: Fix YUV buffers color rendering Ezequiel Garcia
2019-01-03 16:28 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2019-01-07 13:26 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2019-01-07 20:07 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2019-01-08 17:17 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2019-01-08 21:46 ` [PATCH v3] " Ezequiel Garcia
2019-01-10 22:55 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3215325.nePTtMV2FM@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=dcastagna@chromium.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ezequiel@collabora.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox