From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] mmc: core: Add mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc() Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 09:06:48 +0200 Message-ID: <3312969.jJ2hfB2JkV@diego> References: <1443622064-14362-1-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de> <560DF150.3000906@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <560DF150.3000906@samsung.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jaehoon Chung Cc: Ulf Hansson , Stephen Boyd , Michael Turquette , linux-mmc , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Doug Anderson , Alexandru Stan List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, 2. Oktober 2015, 11:52:00 schrieb Jaehoon Chung: > On 10/02/2015 06:05 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On 1 October 2015 at 19:35, Stephen Boyd wro= te: > >> On 10/01, Heiko St=FCbner wrote: > >>> Am Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2015, 11:54:24 schrieb Ulf Hansson: > >>>> On 30 September 2015 at 16:55, Heiko St=FCbner = wrote: > >>>>> Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 16:42:05 schrieb Ulf Hansson: > >>>>>> On 30 September 2015 at 16:07, Heiko Stuebner =20 wrote: > >>>>> The clock changes of course only touch internals of the phase-c= locks, > >>>>> so > >>>>> should have no problem going through another tree. > >>>>=20 > >>>> What happens if I take mmc and dt changes, wouldn't I need the c= lock > >>>> patches as well? > >>>=20 > >>> The API stays of course the same, only the degree to settings > >>> translation gets optimized, so I guess in the worst case you woul= d get > >>> no good phase and thus fall back to non-highspeed modes - but the > >>> system would stay running. > >>>=20 > >>> But of course, if the clock maintainers could Ack the two clock p= atches > >>> and > >>> everything would stay together that would work even better :-) > >>=20 > >> If Ulf doesn't want to take them we can apply them to clk tree. > >> Otherwise, you can have my acked-by on the clk patches. > >=20 > > I don't mind picking up the clock patches. So I consider this as an > > ack for both patch 1 and patch2, thanks. > >=20 > > Now, let's give Jaehoon some time to review the dw_mmc parts. >=20 > I will check other patches on today, if it's ok, i will apply at my > repository. Thanks for giving time! :) I think Ulf wanted to apply the whole series via the mmc tree directly,= but I=20 guess that is between you two to decide ;-) Heiko