From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: hantro: Check whether reset op is defined before use
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 21:13:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a5ef85d-ee82-a1aa-1bf0-9fcb5efec833@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXv+5ESeqzzGAooMUFLiwJEzLneTRDbLggyzTFeq32NzDDUiw@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/30/23 05:38, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 5:44 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/25/23 10:52, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 4:33 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 8/25/23 09:09, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 9:08 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/24/23 12:39, Adam Ford wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 8:39 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The i.MX8MM/N/P does not define the .reset op since reset of the VPU is
>>>>>>>> done by genpd. Check whether the .reset op is defined before calling it
>>>>>>>> to avoid NULL pointer dereference.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Note that the Fixes tag is set to the commit which removed the reset op
>>>>>>>> from i.MX8M Hantro G2 implementation, this is because before this commit
>>>>>>>> all the implementations did define the .reset op.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am surprised I didn't have issues when I was testing the 8MQ and
>>>>>>> 8MM, but this makes sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You need to trigger the VPU watchdog to trigger the crash, that means
>>>>>> you have to get the VPU into some weird state where it fails to decode
>>>>>> frame. Then it triggers the reset and ... boom.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See this patch, that contains a gstreamer invocation to generate such
>>>>>> trigger condition input data:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [PATCH] media: verisilicon: Do not enable G2 postproc downscale if
>>>>>> source is narrower than destination
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "
>>>>>> To generate input test data to trigger this bug, use e.g.:
>>>>>> $ gst-launch-1.0 videotestsrc !
>>>>>> video/x-raw,width=272,height=256,format=I420 ! \
>>>>>> vp9enc ! matroskamux ! filesink location=/tmp/test.vp9
>>>>>> To trigger the bug upon decoding (note that the NV12 must be forced, as
>>>>>> that assures the output data would pass the G2 postproc):
>>>>>> $ gst-launch-1.0 filesrc location=/tmp/test.vp9 ! matroskademux !
>>>>>> vp9parse ! \
>>>>>> v4l2slvp9dec ! video/x-raw,format=NV12 ! videoconvert
>>>>>> ! fbdevsink
>>>>>> "
>>>>>
>>>>> Does it completely recover afterwards? In my previous trials the hardware
>>>>> ended up in some bizzare state: while decoding succeeds, the output's md5sum
>>>>> didn't match up.
>>>>
>>>> Have you got a testcase that triggers this, one I can try ?
>>>>
>>>> I am not entirely sure whether this is happening here as well or not,
>>>> but I can imagine that the power domain went down and back up between
>>>> tests, so the VPU would be power cycled (and therefore reset) that way.
>>>> So, I think it is worth testing that.
>>>
>>> This was last year while I was writing HEVC decoding code for Chromium.
>>> IIRC the SAODBLK_A_MainConcept_4 test vector from the official HEVC test
>>> suite does cause our stack to crash, but Gstreamer seemed to handle it
>>> OK. It could be that the Chromium decoder stack is passing bad values to
>>> the decoder.
>>
>> That can be easily tested with ftrace enabled. I was just tracking down
>> an issue with gstreamer and added the following patch to the hantro
>> driver. Then:
>>
>> echo > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
>> <run fail test>
>> cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace > /tmp/fail.trace
>> echo > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
>> <run pass test>
>> cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace > /tmp/pass.trace
>> # remove time stamps etc.
>> diff /tmp/{fail,pass}.trace
>>
>> You should see whether some register programming differs between
>> gstreamer and chromium.
>
> I ended up using VISL to compare the controls set. I did find a bug.
> It still hard hangs after a couple frames, so I guess I'd need to use
> your method, but do printk instead.
>
> BTW, I wonder if we shouldn't add a reset op, if only just to stop the
> hardware? That is, do the same two register writes as in the Hantro G2
> interrupt handler.
You mean these two ?
38 vdpu_write(vpu, 0, G2_REG_INTERRUPT);
39 vdpu_write(vpu, G2_REG_CONFIG_DEC_CLK_GATE_E, G2_REG_CONFIG);
As far as I understand this, that only clears IRQ and gates the clock
off, but it doesn't reset the IP state, does it ?
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-30 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-24 1:38 [PATCH] media: hantro: Check whether reset op is defined before use Marek Vasut
2023-08-24 2:45 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-08-24 10:39 ` Adam Ford
2023-08-24 13:08 ` Marek Vasut
2023-08-25 7:09 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-08-25 8:33 ` Marek Vasut
2023-08-25 8:52 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-08-26 21:44 ` Marek Vasut
2023-08-30 3:38 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-08-30 19:13 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2023-08-31 3:26 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a5ef85d-ee82-a1aa-1bf0-9fcb5efec833@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=aford173@gmail.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
--cc=ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox