Re: [PATCH] PCI: dw-rockchip: Fix function call sequence in rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit

[Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>]

Hello Diederik,

On 2025-04-17 16:21, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> The documentation for the phy_power_off() function explicitly says
> 
>   Must be called before phy_exit().
> 
> So let's follow that instruction.
> 
> Fixes: 0e898eb8df4e ("PCI: rockchip-dwc: Add Rockchip RK356X host
> controller driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v5.15+
> Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> index c624b7ebd118..4f92639650e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> @@ -410,8 +410,8 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct
> rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> 
>  static void rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  {
> -	phy_exit(rockchip->phy);
>  	phy_power_off(rockchip->phy);
> +	phy_exit(rockchip->phy);
>  }
> 
>  static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {

Thanks for the patch, it's looking good to me.  The current state
of the rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit() function might actually not cause
issues because the rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit() function is used only
in the error-handling path in the rockchip_pcie_probe() function,
so having no runtime errors leads to no possible issues.

However, it doesn't mean it shouldn't be fixed, and it would actually
be good to dissolve the rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit() function into the
above-mentioned error-handling path.  It's a short, two-line function
local to the compile unit, used in a single place only, so dissolving
it is safe and would actually improve the readability of the code.

Thus, please feel free to include

Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>

and please consider dissolving the rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit() function
in the possible v2 of this patch, as suggested above.

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip