Re: [PATCH 4/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add pinctrl and gpio nodes for RK3528

From: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
To: Yao Zi <ziyao@disroot.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add pinctrl and gpio nodes for RK3528
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 12:14:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f0cd767-1fd8-4c65-b8b4-e948288cd02a@kwiboo.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z8GT3rUEyXrTUgtJ@pie.lan>

Hi Yao Zi,

On 2025-02-28 11:46, Yao Zi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 06:40:10AM +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>> Add pinctrl and gpio nodes for RK3528 and import rk3528-pinctrl.dtsi
>> from vendor linux-6.1-stan-rkr5 kernel with the hdmi-pins-idle node
>> removed due to missing label reference to pcfg_output_low_pull_down.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
>> ---
>> This was mostly imported from vendor kernel, however the main commit [1]
>> list 28 signed-off-by tags, unclear who I should use as author and what
>> signed-off-by tags to include.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/commit/c17d6325959f0ec1af901e8a17919163454190a2
>> ---
>>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528-pinctrl.dtsi     | 1397 +++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi      |   82 +
>>  2 files changed, 1479 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528-pinctrl.dtsi
>>
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi
>> index 0fb90f5c291c..d3e2a64ff2d5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi
>> @@ -4,8 +4,10 @@
>>   * Copyright (c) 2024 Yao Zi <ziyao@disroot.org>
>>   */
>>  
>> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>>  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>>  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
>>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3528-cru.h>
>>  #include <dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3528-cru.h>
>>  
>> @@ -17,6 +19,11 @@ / {
>>  	#size-cells = <2>;
>>  
>>  	aliases {
>> +		gpio0 = &gpio0;
>> +		gpio1 = &gpio1;
>> +		gpio2 = &gpio2;
>> +		gpio3 = &gpio3;
>> +		gpio4 = &gpio4;
>>  		serial0 = &uart0;
>>  		serial1 = &uart1;
>>  		serial2 = &uart2;
>> @@ -166,6 +173,11 @@ cru: clock-controller@ff4a0000 {
>>  			#reset-cells = <1>;
>>  		};
>>  
>> +		ioc_grf: syscon@ff540000 {
>> +			compatible = "rockchip,rk3528-ioc-grf", "syscon";
>> +			reg = <0x0 0xff540000 0x0 0x40000>;
>> +		};
>> +
>>  		uart0: serial@ff9f0000 {
>>  			compatible = "rockchip,rk3528-uart", "snps,dw-apb-uart";
>>  			reg = <0x0 0xff9f0000 0x0 0x100>;
>> @@ -264,5 +276,75 @@ saradc: adc@ffae0000 {
>>  			#io-channel-cells = <1>;
>>  			status = "disabled";
>>  		};
>> +
>> +		pinctrl: pinctrl {
>> +			compatible = "rockchip,rk3528-pinctrl";
>> +			rockchip,grf = <&ioc_grf>;
>> +			#address-cells = <2>;
>> +			#size-cells = <2>;
>> +			ranges;
> 
> I doubt whether the pincontroller should be placed under simple-bus:
> without a reg property, it doesn't look like a MMIO device.
> 
> Actually it is, although all the registers stay in the ioc grf. Maybe
> it should be considered as child of the grf.

This follows how pinctrl was added for RK3576 and what is proposed for
RK3562 [2]. I have too little knowledge to know if this needs to change
or if this should follow similar SoCs.

[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250227111913.2344207-15-kever.yang@rock-chips.com

Regards,
Jonas

> 
> Best regards,
> Yao Zi

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip