From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring-S0/GAf8tV78@public.gmane.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Cc: Yi Wang <wang.yi59-Th6q7B73Y6EnDS1+zs4M5A@public.gmane.org>,
Russell King <linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org>,
Florian Fainelli
<f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Wen Yang <wen.yang99-Th6q7B73Y6EnDS1+zs4M5A@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [v3] ARM: rockchip: Fix a leaked reference by adding of_node_put() in two functions
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 12:52:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43884c4b-8146-9a35-ae5d-40ab17a4a04c@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2816348.laE8LpYbrI@phil>
>> How do you think about to adjust the exception handling in these function
>> implementations a bit more according to the Linux coding style
>> (so that the addition of duplicate function calls would be avoided)?
>
> I actually requested not doing wild gotos for of_node_put calls,
> as it makes the code harder to read, especially when the "node"
> gets reused for a different node-source.
Does this feedback mean that you insist on another deviation
from the Linux coding style?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-28 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-26 7:08 [PATCH v3] ARM: rockchip: fix a leaked reference by adding missing of_node_put Wen Yang
2019-04-28 6:27 ` [v3] ARM: rockchip: Fix a leaked reference by adding of_node_put() in two functions Markus Elfring
2019-04-28 10:40 ` Heiko Stuebner
2019-04-28 10:52 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2019-04-28 10:46 ` [PATCH v3] ARM: rockchip: fix a leaked reference by adding missing of_node_put Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43884c4b-8146-9a35-ae5d-40ab17a4a04c@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring-s0/gaf8tv78@public.gmane.org \
--cc=f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wang.yi59-Th6q7B73Y6EnDS1+zs4M5A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wen.yang99-Th6q7B73Y6EnDS1+zs4M5A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox