From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
heiko@sntech.de, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org,
robh@kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Unify link status checks with FIELD_GET
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:29:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44121a71-26a9-4203-a219-eeb26ff8763c@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAeKcEfyDS1ImynJ@ryzen>
On 2025/4/22 20:24, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:50:50PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2025/4/22 19:39, Niklas Cassel wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:28:30PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
>>>> Link-up detection manually checked PCIE_LINKUP bits across RC/EP modes,
>>>> leading to code duplication. Centralize the logic using FIELD_GET. This
>>>> removes redundancy and abstracts hardware-specific bit masking, ensuring
>>>> consistent link state handling.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 15 +++++----------
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>>>> index cdc8afc6cfc1..2b26060af5c2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>>>> @@ -196,10 +196,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>>>> struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
>>>> u32 val = rockchip_pcie_get_ltssm(rockchip);
>>>> - if ((val & PCIE_LINKUP) == PCIE_LINKUP)
>>>> - return 1;
>>>> -
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> + return FIELD_GET(PCIE_LINKUP_MASK, val) == 3;
>>>
>>> While I like the idea of your patch, here you are replacing something that
>>> is easy to read (PCIE_LINKUP) with a magic value, which IMO is a step in
>>> the wrong direction.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Niklas,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your reply. How about I add another macro
>> definition?
>>
>> #define PCIE_LINKUP 3
>
> Yes, adding another macro for it is what I meant.
>
Hi Niklas,
Thank you very much for your reply and reminder. The second and third
patches will be changed as follows:
patch 0002:
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
index fd5827bbfae3..4d5c8ed18953 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
@@ -34,30 +34,37 @@
#define to_rockchip_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
-#define PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0x40)
-#define PCIE_CLIENT_EP_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE(0xf0, 0x0)
-#define PCIE_CLIENT_ENABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0xc)
-#define PCIE_CLIENT_DISABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE(0x0c, 0x8)
-#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MSG_RX 0x04
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL 0x0
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0x40)
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_EP_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE(0xf0, 0x0)
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_ENABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0xc)
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_DISABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE(0x0c, 0x8)
+
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MSG_RX 0x4
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_LEGACY 0x8
+
#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC 0x10
+#define PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED BIT(1)
+#define PCIE_LINK_REQ_RST_NOT_INT BIT(2)
+
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_LEGACY 0x1c
#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_MISC 0x24
+
#define PCIE_CLIENT_POWER 0x2c
+#define PME_READY_ENTER_L23 BIT(3)
+
#define PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN 0x34
-#define PME_READY_ENTER_L23 BIT(3)
-#define PME_TURN_OFF (BIT(4) | BIT(20))
-#define PME_TO_ACK (BIT(9) | BIT(25))
-#define PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP BIT(16)
-#define PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP BIT(17)
-#define PCIE_LINKUP (PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP | PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP)
-#define PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED BIT(1)
-#define PCIE_LINK_REQ_RST_NOT_INT BIT(2)
-#define PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL 0x0
-#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_LEGACY 0x8
-#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_LEGACY 0x1c
+#define PME_TURN_OFF HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(BIT(4))
+#define PME_TO_ACK HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(BIT(9))
+
#define PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL 0x180
+#define PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE BIT(4)
+
#define PCIE_CLIENT_LTSSM_STATUS 0x300
-#define PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE BIT(4)
-#define PCIE_LTSSM_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(5, 0)
+#define PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP BIT(16)
+#define PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP BIT(17)
+#define PCIE_LINKUP (PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP | PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP)
+#define PCIE_LTSSM_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(5, 0)
struct rockchip_pcie {
struct dw_pcie pci;
patch 0003:
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
index 4d5c8ed18953..0553e7e80e1b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
* Author: Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
*/
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
@@ -61,9 +62,8 @@
#define PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE BIT(4)
#define PCIE_CLIENT_LTSSM_STATUS 0x300
-#define PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP BIT(16)
-#define PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP BIT(17)
-#define PCIE_LINKUP (PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP | PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP)
+#define PCIE_LINKUP 0x3
+#define PCIE_LINKUP_MASK GENMASK(17, 16)
#define PCIE_LTSSM_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(5, 0)
struct rockchip_pcie {
@@ -197,10 +197,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
u32 val = rockchip_pcie_get_ltssm(rockchip);
- if ((val & PCIE_LINKUP) == PCIE_LINKUP)
- return 1;
-
- return 0;
+ return FIELD_GET(PCIE_LINKUP_MASK, val) == PCIE_LINKUP;
}
static void rockchip_pcie_enable_l0s(struct dw_pcie *pci)
@@ -500,7 +497,7 @@ static irqreturn_t
rockchip_pcie_rc_sys_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
struct dw_pcie *pci = &rockchip->pci;
struct dw_pcie_rp *pp = &pci->pp;
struct device *dev = pci->dev;
- u32 reg, val;
+ u32 reg;
reg = rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC);
rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, reg, PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC);
@@ -509,8 +506,7 @@ static irqreturn_t
rockchip_pcie_rc_sys_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
dev_dbg(dev, "LTSSM_STATUS: %#x\n", rockchip_pcie_get_ltssm(rockchip));
if (reg & PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED) {
- val = rockchip_pcie_get_ltssm(rockchip);
- if ((val & PCIE_LINKUP) == PCIE_LINKUP) {
+ if (rockchip_pcie_link_up(pci)) {
dev_dbg(dev, "Received Link up event. Starting enumeration!\n");
/* Rescan the bus to enumerate endpoint devices */
pci_lock_rescan_remove();
@@ -527,7 +523,7 @@ static irqreturn_t
rockchip_pcie_ep_sys_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = arg;
struct dw_pcie *pci = &rockchip->pci;
struct device *dev = pci->dev;
- u32 reg, val;
+ u32 reg;
reg = rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC);
rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, reg, PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC);
@@ -541,8 +537,7 @@ static irqreturn_t
rockchip_pcie_ep_sys_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
}
if (reg & PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED) {
- val = rockchip_pcie_get_ltssm(rockchip);
- if ((val & PCIE_LINKUP) == PCIE_LINKUP) {
+ if (rockchip_pcie_link_up(pci)) {
dev_dbg(dev, "link up\n");
dw_pcie_ep_linkup(&pci->ep);
}
Best regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-22 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-22 11:28 [PATCH 0/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Reorganize register and bitfield definitions Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 11:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Remove unused PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_DEBUG Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 11:35 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-22 11:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Reorganize register and bitfield definitions Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 11:47 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-22 11:51 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 12:30 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-22 12:39 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 16:03 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 11:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Unify link status checks with FIELD_GET Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 11:39 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-22 11:50 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 12:24 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-22 12:29 ` Hans Zhang [this message]
2025-04-22 11:35 ` [PATCH 0/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Reorganize register and bitfield definitions Hans Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44121a71-26a9-4203-a219-eeb26ff8763c@163.com \
--to=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox