From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Chauveau Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Documentation: devicetree: Clean up gpio-keys example Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:41:37 +0100 Message-ID: <525564DD-D0D3-4DEB-9306-3A23288FD83F@gmail.com> References: <1457375055-5544-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , =?utf-8?Q?Heiko_St=C3=BCbner?= , Dmitry Torokhov , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , open list List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org > Le 8 mars 2016 =C3=A0 09:54, Geert Uytterhoeven a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >> Drop #address-cells and #size-cells, which are not required by the >> gpio-keys binding documentation, as button sub-nodes are not devices= =2E >>=20 >> Reported-by: Julien Chauveau >> Signed-off-by: Andreas F=C3=A4rber >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt | 2 -- >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >>=20 >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt b= /Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt >> index 21641236c095..1552a11f6786 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt >> @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ Example nodes: >>=20 >> gpio_keys { >> compatible =3D "gpio-keys"; >> - #address-cells =3D <1>; >> - #size-cells =3D <0>; >> autorepeat; >> button@21 { >=20 > FYI, with "[PATCH] scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version 53bf130b1c= dd": > (http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg117206.html) applied: >=20 > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /keyboard/button@21 has a unit > name, but no reg property >=20 Hi Andreas, This means you can also drop the unit-address (the @21 part) for the bu= tton. What about using a more relevant name like "key_up" instead of "button"= ? Julien-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html