Re: [PATCH] PCI: dw-rockchip: Configure max payload size on host init

[Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>]

On 2025/4/17 15:48, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:25:06PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
>> 在 2025/04/17 星期四 15:22, Niklas Cassel 写道:
>>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:08:34PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
>>>> 在 2025/04/17 星期四 15:04, Niklas Cassel 写道:
>>>>> Hello Hans,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 11:19:26PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
>>>>>> The RK3588's PCIe controller defaults to a 128-byte max payload size,
>>>>>> but its hardware capability actually supports 256 bytes. This results
>>>>>> in suboptimal performance with devices that support larger payloads.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch looks good to me, but please always reference the TRM when you can.
>>>>>
>>>>> Before this patch:
>>>>> 		DevCap: MaxPayload 256 bytes
>>>>> 		DevCtl: MaxPayload 128 bytes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As per rk3588 TRM, section "11.4.3.8 DSP_PCIE_CAP Detail Registers Description"
>>>>>
>>>>> DevCap is per the register description of DSP_PCIE_CAP_DEVICE_CAPABILITIES_REG,
>>>>> field PCIE_CAP_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE.
>>>>> Which claims that the value after reset is 0x1 (256B).
>>>>>
>>>>> DevCtl is per the register description of
>>>>> DSP_PCIE_CAP_DEVICE_CONTROL_DEVICE_STATUS, field PCIE_CAP_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_CS.
>>>>> Which claims that the reset value is 0x0 (128B).
>>>>>
>>>>> Both of these match the values above.
>>>>>
>>>>> As per the description of PCIE_CAP_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_CS:
>>>>> "Permissible values that
>>>>> can be programmed are indicated by the Max_Payload_Size
>>>>> Supported field (PCIE_CAP_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE) in the Device
>>>>> Capabilities (DEVICE_CAPABILITIES_REG) register (for more
>>>>> details, see section 7.5.3.3 of PCI Express Base Specification)."
>>>>>
>>>>> So your patch looks good.
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess I'm mostly surprised that the e.g. pci_configure_mps() does not
>>>>> already set DevCtl to the max(DevCap.MPS of the host, DevCap.MPS of the
>>>>> endpoint).
>>>>>
>>>>> Apparently pci_configure_mps() only decreases MPS from the reset values?
>>>>> It never increases it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually it does:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt#L4757
>>>
>>> If that is the case, then explain the before/after with Hans lspci output here:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/bb40385c-6839-484c-90b2-d6c7ecb95ba9@163.com/
>>>
>>> His patch changes the default value of DevCtl.MPS (from 128B to 256B), but if
>>> pci_configure_mps() can bump DevCtl.MPS to a higher value, his patch should not
>>> be needed, since the EP (an NVMe SSD in his case) has DevCap.MPS 512B, and the
>>> RC itself has DevCap.MPS 256B.
>>>
>>> Seems like we are missing something here.
>>
>> So Hans, could you please help set pci=pcie_bus_safe or
>> pci=pcie_bus_perf in your cmdline, and see how lspci dump different
>> without your patch?
> 
> It seems that the default MPS strategy can be set using Kconfigs:
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.15-rc2/drivers/pci/pci.c#L126-L136
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.15-rc2/include/linux/pci.h#L1110-L1116
> 
> Note that the these Kconfigs are hidden behind CONFIG_EXPERT.
> So unless you have explicitly set one of these Kconfigs, the default should be:
> PCIE_BUS_DEFAULT,	/* Ensure MPS matches upstream bridge */


Hi Niklas and Shawn,

Thank you very much for your discussion and reply.

I tested it on RK3588 and our platform. By setting pci=pcie_bus_safe, 
the maximum MPS will be automatically matched in the end.

So is my patch no longer needed? For RK3588, does the customer have to 
configure CONFIG_PCIE_BUS_SAFE or pci=pcie_bus_safe?

Also, for pci-meson.c, can the meson_set_max_payload be deleted?


Best regards,
Hans



_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip