From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jaehoon Chung Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] mmc: core: Add mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc() Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:52:00 +0900 Message-ID: <560DF150.3000906@samsung.com> References: <1443622064-14362-1-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de> <17200614.QxCe8zAb7I@diego> <2695161.Z1IhqPE0bd@diego> <20151001173554.GB19319@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-reply-to: Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ulf Hansson , Stephen Boyd Cc: =?UTF-8?B?SGVpa28gU3TDvGJuZXI=?= , Michael Turquette , linux-mmc , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Doug Anderson , Alexandru Stan List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org On 10/02/2015 06:05 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 1 October 2015 at 19:35, Stephen Boyd wrote= : >> On 10/01, Heiko St=C3=BCbner wrote: >>> Am Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2015, 11:54:24 schrieb Ulf Hansson: >>>> On 30 September 2015 at 16:55, Heiko St=C3=BCbner wrote: >>>>> Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 16:42:05 schrieb Ulf Hansson: >>>>>> On 30 September 2015 at 16:07, Heiko Stuebner = wrote: >>>>> The clock changes of course only touch internals of the phase-clo= cks, so >>>>> should have no problem going through another tree. >>>> >>>> What happens if I take mmc and dt changes, wouldn't I need the clo= ck >>>> patches as well? >>> >>> The API stays of course the same, only the degree to settings trans= lation gets >>> optimized, so I guess in the worst case you would get no good phase= and thus >>> fall back to non-highspeed modes - but the system would stay runnin= g. >>> >>> But of course, if the clock maintainers could Ack the two clock pat= ches and >>> everything would stay together that would work even better :-) >>> >> >> If Ulf doesn't want to take them we can apply them to clk tree. >> Otherwise, you can have my acked-by on the clk patches. >=20 > I don't mind picking up the clock patches. So I consider this as an > ack for both patch 1 and patch2, thanks. >=20 > Now, let's give Jaehoon some time to review the dw_mmc parts. I will check other patches on today, if it's ok, i will apply at my rep= ository. Thanks for giving time! :) Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung >=20 > Kind regards > Uffe >=20