From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jaehoon Chung Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] mmc: core: Add mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc() Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:48:18 +0900 Message-ID: <560E44D2.9060101@samsung.com> References: <1443622064-14362-1-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de> <560DF150.3000906@samsung.com> <3312969.jJ2hfB2JkV@diego> <560E3800.1060603@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-reply-to: Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ulf Hansson Cc: =?UTF-8?B?SGVpa28gU3TDvGJuZXI=?= , Stephen Boyd , Michael Turquette , linux-mmc , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Doug Anderson , Alexandru Stan List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org On 10/02/2015 05:43 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 2 October 2015 at 09:53, Jaehoon Chung wr= ote: >> On 10/02/2015 04:06 PM, Heiko St=C3=BCbner wrote: >>> Am Freitag, 2. Oktober 2015, 11:52:00 schrieb Jaehoon Chung: >>>> On 10/02/2015 06:05 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>>>> On 1 October 2015 at 19:35, Stephen Boyd w= rote: >>>>>> On 10/01, Heiko St=C3=BCbner wrote: >>>>>>> Am Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2015, 11:54:24 schrieb Ulf Hansson: >>>>>>>> On 30 September 2015 at 16:55, Heiko St=C3=BCbner wrote: >>>>>>>>> Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 16:42:05 schrieb Ulf Hansson= : >>>>>>>>>> On 30 September 2015 at 16:07, Heiko Stuebner >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> The clock changes of course only touch internals of the phase= -clocks, >>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>> should have no problem going through another tree. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What happens if I take mmc and dt changes, wouldn't I need the= clock >>>>>>>> patches as well? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The API stays of course the same, only the degree to settings >>>>>>> translation gets optimized, so I guess in the worst case you wo= uld get >>>>>>> no good phase and thus fall back to non-highspeed modes - but t= he >>>>>>> system would stay running. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But of course, if the clock maintainers could Ack the two clock= patches >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> everything would stay together that would work even better :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> If Ulf doesn't want to take them we can apply them to clk tree. >>>>>> Otherwise, you can have my acked-by on the clk patches. >>>>> >>>>> I don't mind picking up the clock patches. So I consider this as = an >>>>> ack for both patch 1 and patch2, thanks. >>>>> >>>>> Now, let's give Jaehoon some time to review the dw_mmc parts. >>>> >>>> I will check other patches on today, if it's ok, i will apply at m= y >>>> repository. Thanks for giving time! :) >>> >>> I think Ulf wanted to apply the whole series via the mmc tree direc= tly, but I >>> guess that is between you two to decide ;-) >> >> If it will get Stephen's acked-by, i will pick up all after checked = the dwmmc patches. how about? >=20 > Stephen already acked the clock patches from this thread. >=20 > Perhaps this time, it's easier if you ack the dw_mmc patches and I ca= n > pick up the hole series? Does that work for you? I doesn't review dwmmc patches (Sorry), could you give me more time? If you're ok, i will notice to you...then you can pick up all. :) Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung >=20 > Kind regards > Uffe >=20