From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark yao Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] drm: Introduce generic probe function for component based masters. Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:53:09 +0800 Message-ID: <5641B075.6020602@rock-chips.com> References: <1445267270-23126-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <1445267270-23126-2-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <564069CD.2070102@rock-chips.com> <20151109114259.GX8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20151109115727.GE963@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1208105507==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151109115727.GE963@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: Liviu Dudau , Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Daniel Vetter , LKML , dri-devel , linux-rockchip , LAKML List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1208105507== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050903030302010300090109" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050903030302010300090109 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2015=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8809=E6=97=A5 19:57, Liviu Dudau wrote: > Meanwhile, what is your suggestion regarding the patchset. I've seen Da= vid has > sent Linus a pull request for 4.4-rc1 that includes it. Should we send = a > revert for rockchip commit and then patch later the function? Hi Liviu I had sent a patch to revert this rockchip commit, verfied rockchip=20 drm works. So we can do the fix later. Thanks all the same. :-) -- =EF=BC=ADark Yao --------------050903030302010300090109 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 2015=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8809=E6=97=A5= 19:57, Liviu Dudau wrote:
Meanwhile, what is your suggestion regarding the pat=
chset. I've seen David has
sent Linus a pull request for 4.4-rc1 that includes it. Should we send a
revert for rockchip commit and then patch later the function?
Hi Liviu
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 I had sent a patch to revert this rockchip commit,= verfied rockchip drm works. So we can do the fix later.

Thanks all the same. :-) =

-- =EF=BC=ADark Yao --------------050903030302010300090109-- --===============1208105507== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0 cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9kcmktZGV2ZWwK --===============1208105507==--