Re: [PATCH RESEND] Documentation: devicetree: Clean up gpio-keys example

Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-08T08:54:50Z

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> Drop #address-cells and #size-cells, which are not required by the
> gpio-keys binding documentation, as button sub-nodes are not devices.
>
> Reported-by: Julien Chauveau <chauveau.julien@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
> index 21641236c095..1552a11f6786 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
> @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ Example nodes:
>
> gpio_keys {
> compatible = "gpio-keys";
> - #address-cells = <1>;
> - #size-cells = <0>;
> autorepeat;
> button@21 {

FYI, with "[PATCH] scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version 53bf130b1cdd":
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg117206.html) applied:

Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /keyboard/button@21 has a unit
name, but no reg property

> label = "GPIO Key UP";

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds