From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Alex Lemberg <alex.lemberg@sandisk.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: add auto bkops support
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:29:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <575E52AC.6000902@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465182439-27963-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
On 06/06/16 06:07, Shawn Lin wrote:
> JEDEC eMMC v5.1 introduce an autonomously initiated method
> for background operations.
>
> Host that wants to enable the device to perform background
> operations during device idle time, should signal the device
> by setting AUTO_EN in BKOPS_EN field EXT_CSD[163] to 1b. When
> this bit is set, the device may start or stop background operations
> whenever it sees fit, without any notification to the host.
>
> When AUTO_EN bit is set, the host should keep the device power
> active. The host may set or clear this bit at any time based on
> its power constraints or other considerations.
>
> Currently the manual bkops is only be used under the async req
> circumstances and it's a bit complicated to be controlled as the
> perfect method is that we should do some idle monitor just as rpm
> and send HPI each time if receiving rd/wr req. But it will impact
> performance significantly, especially for random iops since the
> weight of executing HPI against r/w small piece of LBAs is
> nonnegligible.
>
> So we now prefer to select the auto one unconditionally if supported
> which makes it as simple as possible. It should really good enough
> for devices to manage its internal policy for bkops rather than the
> host, which makes us believe that we could achieve the best
> performance for all the devices implementing auto bkops and the only
> thing we should do is to disable it when cutting off the power.
Do you know if there is really a requirement to do that? Because then, what
is the point of power off notification? And why is AUTO_EN persistent across
power failure?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-06 3:07 [PATCH] mmc: core: add auto bkops support Shawn Lin
[not found] ` <1465182439-27963-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-08 14:46 ` Alex Lemberg
2016-06-12 1:13 ` Shawn Lin
[not found] ` <d5c75760-e8b4-1784-a7de-3d78eeca1d0e-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-20 13:33 ` Alex Lemberg
[not found] ` <7078F2B9-63B6-4170-BFA1-5AC370F0D4DD-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-21 0:38 ` Jaehoon Chung
2016-06-21 1:44 ` Shawn Lin
[not found] ` <29966a6f-eb14-0307-08cc-f91a97f50382-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-22 14:08 ` Alex Lemberg
2016-06-23 1:33 ` Shawn Lin
2016-06-23 5:22 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-06-27 9:08 ` Ulf Hansson
[not found] ` <CAPDyKFoxTH_-U_Aj0jHWPKbwd+4OoOYBTdOeD-6SpG4XyM=3AA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-27 11:30 ` Alex Lemberg
2016-06-13 6:29 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
[not found] ` <575E52AC.6000902-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-13 7:48 ` Shawn Lin
2016-06-13 8:17 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-06-13 8:58 ` Shawn Lin
2016-06-13 12:25 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-06-22 10:21 ` Ulf Hansson
[not found] ` <CAPDyKFq7Pr1YiacwpeDq3eAYmApydTj8Kbkyh=Cb6+vJC9BV3Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-22 14:20 ` Alex Lemberg
[not found] ` <B9A5F20C-E8A0-4E81-BA07-79E60017E728-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-22 14:28 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-06-22 14:57 ` Alex Lemberg
[not found] ` <362217AA-5AE7-471A-AF58-985676E261A4-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-22 15:03 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-06-23 2:08 ` Shawn Lin
2016-06-27 9:00 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=575E52AC.6000902@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alex.lemberg@sandisk.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).