From: Yakir Yang <ykk@rock-chips.com>
To: "Sean Paul" <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
"Mark Yao" <yzq@rock-chips.com>,
"Inki Dae" <inki.dae@samsung.com>,
"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Stéphane Marchesin" <marcheu@chromium.org>,
"Tomasz Figa" <tfiga@chromium.org>,
"Doug Anderson" <dianders@chromium.org>,
"Thierry Reding" <treding@nvidia.com>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
"Javier Martinez Canillas" <javier@osg.samsung.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Emil Velikov" <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/rockchip: add an common abstracted PSR driver
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:36:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5785B73B.6000301@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160712123826.GU23520@phenom.ffwll.local>
Daniel,
On 07/12/2016 08:38 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 02:00:00PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Yakir Yang <ykk@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>> The PSR driver have exported four symbols for specific device driver:
>>> - rockchip_drm_psr_register()
>>> - rockchip_drm_psr_unregister()
>>> - rockchip_drm_psr_enable()
>>> - rockchip_drm_psr_disable()
>>> - rockchip_drm_psr_flush()
>>>
>>> Encoder driver should call the register/unregister interfaces to hook
>>> itself into common PSR driver, encoder have implement the 'psr_set'
>>> callback which use the set PSR state in hardware side.
>>>
>>> Crtc driver would call the enable/disable interfaces when vblank is
>>> enable/disable, after that the common PSR driver would call the encoder
>>> registered callback to set the PSR state.
>>>
>> This feels overly complicated. It seems like you could cut out a bunch
>> of code by just coding the psr functions into vop and
>> analogix_dp-rockchip. I suppose the only reason to keep it abstracted
>> would be if you plan on supporting psr in a different encoder or crtc
>> in rockchip, or if you're planning on moving this into drm core.
> Agreed on the layers of indirection. Also, you end up with 3 delayed
> timers in total:
> - defio timer from fbdev emulation
> - timer in this abstraction
> - delayed work in the psr backend driver
>
> I'd cut out at least the middle one.
>
> But since this seems to correctly use the ->dirty callback it gets my Ack
> either way ;-)
Aha, thanks :-D
- Yakir
> Cheers, Daniel
>
>> Perhaps others will disagree with this sentiment and this is the right
>> thing to do.
>>
>>> Fb driver would call the flush interface in 'fb->dirty' callback, this
>>> helper function would force all PSR enabled encoders to exit from PSR
>>> for 3 seconds.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@rock-chips.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - split the psr flow into an common abstracted PSR driver
>>> - implement the 'fb->dirty' callback function (Daniel)
>>> - avoid to use notify to acqiure for vact event (Daniel)
>>> - remove psr_active() callback which introduce in v2
>>>
>>> Changes in v2: None
>>>
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/Makefile | 2 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c | 12 ++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.c | 200 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.h | 12 ++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c | 24 ++++
>>> 5 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.c
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/Makefile
>>> index 05d0713..9746365 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/Makefile
>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>> # Direct Rendering Infrastructure (DRI) in XFree86 4.1.0 and higher.
>>>
>>> rockchipdrm-y := rockchip_drm_drv.o rockchip_drm_fb.o \
>>> - rockchip_drm_gem.o rockchip_drm_vop.o
>>> + rockchip_drm_gem.o rockchip_drm_psr.o rockchip_drm_vop.o
>>> rockchipdrm-$(CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION) += rockchip_drm_fbdev.o
>>>
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ANALOGIX_DP) += analogix_dp-rockchip.o
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
>>> index 20f12bc..0fec18f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
>>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>>>
>>> #include "rockchip_drm_drv.h"
>>> #include "rockchip_drm_gem.h"
>>> +#include "rockchip_drm_psr.h"
>>>
>>> #define to_rockchip_fb(x) container_of(x, struct rockchip_drm_fb, fb)
>>>
>>> @@ -66,9 +67,20 @@ static int rockchip_drm_fb_create_handle(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
>>> rockchip_fb->obj[0], handle);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int rockchip_drm_fb_dirty(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
>>> + struct drm_file *file,
>>> + unsigned int flags, unsigned int color,
>>> + struct drm_clip_rect *clips,
>>> + unsigned int num_clips)
>>> +{
>>> + rockchip_drm_psr_flush();
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs rockchip_drm_fb_funcs = {
>>> .destroy = rockchip_drm_fb_destroy,
>>> .create_handle = rockchip_drm_fb_create_handle,
>>> + .dirty = rockchip_drm_fb_dirty,
>>> };
>>>
>>> static struct rockchip_drm_fb *
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..c044443
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
>>> +#include <drm/drm_crtc_helper.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include "rockchip_drm_psr.h"
>>> +
>>> +#define PSR_FLUSH_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(3000) /* 3 seconds */
>>> +
>>> +static LIST_HEAD(psr_list);
>>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(psr_list_mutex);
>> I'm not crazy about these globals. Perhaps you can initialize them
>> with the rockchip driver and tuck them in a driver-level struct
>> (rockchip_drm_private or something).
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> +enum psr_state {
>>> + PSR_FLUSH,
>>> + PSR_ENABLE,
>>> + PSR_DISABLE,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct psr_drv {
>>> + struct list_head list;
>>> + enum psr_state state;
>>> + struct mutex state_mutex;
>>> +
>>> + struct timer_list flush_timer;
>>> +
>>> + struct drm_encoder *encoder;
>>> + int (*set)(struct drm_encoder *encoder, bool enable);
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct psr_drv *find_psr_by_crtc(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>>> +{
>>> + struct psr_drv *psr;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&psr_list_mutex);
>>> + list_for_each_entry(psr, &psr_list, list) {
>>> + if (psr->encoder->crtc == crtc) {
>>> + mutex_unlock(&psr_list_mutex);
>>> + return psr;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + mutex_unlock(&psr_list_mutex);
>>> +
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void psr_enable(struct psr_drv *psr)
>>> +{
>>> + if (psr->state == PSR_ENABLE)
>>> + return;
>> Should you be worried about races by accessing this outside of the state mutex?
>>
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&psr->state_mutex);
>>> + psr->state = PSR_ENABLE;
>>> + psr->set(psr->encoder, true);
>>> + mutex_unlock(&psr->state_mutex);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void psr_disable(struct psr_drv *psr)
>>> +{
>>> + if (psr->state == PSR_DISABLE)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&psr->state_mutex);
>>> + psr->state = PSR_DISABLE;
>>> + psr->set(psr->encoder, false);
>>> + mutex_unlock(&psr->state_mutex);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void psr_flush_handler(unsigned long data)
>>> +{
>>> + struct psr_drv *psr = (struct psr_drv *)data;
>>> +
>>> + if (!psr || psr->state != PSR_FLUSH)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + psr_enable(psr);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * rockchip_drm_psr_enable - enable the encoder PSR which bind to given CRTC
>>> + * @crtc: CRTC to obtain the PSR encoder
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns:
>>> + * Zero on success, negative errno on failure.
>>> + */
>>> +int rockchip_drm_psr_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>>> +{
>>> + struct psr_drv *psr = find_psr_by_crtc(crtc);
>>> +
>>> + if (IS_ERR(psr))
>>> + return PTR_ERR(psr);
>>> +
>>> + psr_enable(psr);
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rockchip_drm_psr_enable);
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * rockchip_drm_psr_disable - disable the encoder PSR which bind to given CRTC
>>> + * @crtc: CRTC to obtain the PSR encoder
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns:
>>> + * Zero on success, negative errno on failure.
>>> + */
>>> +int rockchip_drm_psr_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>>> +{
>>> + struct psr_drv *psr = find_psr_by_crtc(crtc);
>>> +
>>> + if (IS_ERR(psr))
>>> + return PTR_ERR(psr);
>>> +
>>> + psr_disable(psr);
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rockchip_drm_psr_disable);
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * rockchip_drm_psr_flush - force to flush all registered PSR encoders
>>> + *
>>> + * Disable the PSR function for all registered encoders, and then enable the
>>> + * PSR function back after 5 second. If encoder PSR state have been changed
>> s/5 second/PSR_FLUSH_TIMEOUT/
>>
>>> + * during flush time, then keep the state no change after flush timeout.
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns:
>>> + * Zero on success, negative errno on failure.
>>> + */
>>> +void rockchip_drm_psr_flush(void)
>>> +{
>>> + struct psr_drv *psr;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&psr_list_mutex);
>>> + list_for_each_entry(psr, &psr_list, list) {
>>> + if (psr->state == PSR_DISABLE)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + mod_timer(&psr->flush_timer,
>>> + round_jiffies_up(jiffies + PSR_FLUSH_TIMEOUT));
>>> +
>>> + psr_disable(psr);
>>> + psr->state = PSR_FLUSH;
>> This is set outside of state_mutex, is that intentional?
>>
>>> + }
>>> + mutex_unlock(&psr_list_mutex);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rockchip_drm_psr_flush);
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * rockchip_drm_psr_register - register encoder to psr driver
>>> + * @encoder: encoder that obtain the PSR function
>>> + * @psr_set: call back to set PSR state
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns:
>>> + * Zero on success, negative errno on failure.
>>> + */
>>> +int rockchip_drm_psr_register(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
>>> + int (*psr_set)(struct drm_encoder *, bool enable))
>>> +{
>>> + struct psr_drv *psr;
>>> +
>>> + if (!encoder || !psr_set)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + psr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct psr_drv), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!psr)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + setup_timer(&psr->flush_timer, psr_flush_handler, (unsigned long)psr);
>>> +
>>> + mutex_init(&psr->state_mutex);
>>> +
>>> + psr->state = PSR_DISABLE;
>>> + psr->encoder = encoder;
>>> + psr->set = psr_set;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&psr_list_mutex);
>>> + list_add_tail(&psr->list, &psr_list);
>>> + mutex_unlock(&psr_list_mutex);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rockchip_drm_psr_register);
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * rockchip_drm_psr_unregister - unregister encoder to psr driver
>>> + * @encoder: encoder that obtain the PSR function
>>> + * @psr_set: call back to set PSR state
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns:
>>> + * Zero on success, negative errno on failure.
>>> + */
>>> +void rockchip_drm_psr_unregister(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>>> +{
>>> + struct psr_drv *psr;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&psr_list_mutex);
>>> + list_for_each_entry(psr, &psr_list, list) {
>>> + if (psr->encoder == encoder) {
>>> + del_timer(&psr->flush_timer);
>>> + list_del(&psr->list);
>>> + kfree(psr);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + mutex_unlock(&psr_list_mutex);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rockchip_drm_psr_unregister);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..622f605
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
>>> +#ifndef __ROCKCHIP_DRM_PSR___
>>> +#define __ROCKCHIP_DRM_PSR___
>>> +
>>> +void rockchip_drm_psr_flush(void);
>>> +int rockchip_drm_psr_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
>>> +int rockchip_drm_psr_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
>>> +
>>> +int rockchip_drm_psr_register(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
>>> + int (*psr_set)(struct drm_encoder *, bool enable));
>>> +void rockchip_drm_psr_unregister(struct drm_encoder *encoder);
>>> +
>>> +#endif /* __ROCKCHIP_DRM_PSR__ */
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>> index cd3cac5..3c6dfc5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>>> #include "rockchip_drm_drv.h"
>>> #include "rockchip_drm_gem.h"
>>> #include "rockchip_drm_fb.h"
>>> +#include "rockchip_drm_psr.h"
>>> #include "rockchip_drm_vop.h"
>>>
>>> #define __REG_SET_RELAXED(x, off, mask, shift, v, write_mask) \
>>> @@ -121,6 +122,9 @@ struct vop {
>>> /* protected by dev->event_lock */
>>> struct drm_pending_vblank_event *event;
>>>
>>> + bool psr_enabled;
>>> + struct delayed_work psr_work;
>>> +
>>> struct completion line_flag_completion;
>>>
>>> const struct vop_data *data;
>>> @@ -911,6 +915,16 @@ static const struct drm_plane_funcs vop_plane_funcs = {
>>> .atomic_destroy_state = vop_atomic_plane_destroy_state,
>>> };
>>>
>>> +static void vop_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> +{
>>> + struct vop *vop = container_of(work, typeof(*vop), psr_work.work);
>>> +
>>> + if (vop->psr_enabled)
>>> + rockchip_drm_psr_enable(&vop->crtc);
>>> + else
>>> + rockchip_drm_psr_disable(&vop->crtc);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int vop_crtc_enable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>>> {
>>> struct vop *vop = to_vop(crtc);
>>> @@ -925,6 +939,9 @@ static int vop_crtc_enable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>>>
>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
>>>
>>> + vop->psr_enabled = false;
>>> + schedule_delayed_work(&vop->psr_work, msecs_to_jiffies(10));
>>> +
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -941,6 +958,9 @@ static void vop_crtc_disable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>>> VOP_INTR_SET_TYPE(vop, enable, FS_INTR, 0);
>>>
>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> + vop->psr_enabled = true;
>>> + schedule_delayed_work(&vop->psr_work, msecs_to_jiffies(10));
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void vop_crtc_wait_for_update(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>>> @@ -1582,6 +1602,10 @@ static int vop_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>>> return ret;
>>>
>>> pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>>> +
>>> + vop->psr_enabled = false;
>>> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&vop->psr_work, vop_psr_work);
>>> +
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> --
>>> 1.9.1
>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-13 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-01 9:18 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add PSR function support for Analogix/Rockchip DP Yakir Yang
2016-07-01 9:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/rockchip: vop: export line flag function Yakir Yang
[not found] ` <1467364745-21621-1-git-send-email-ykk-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-01 15:30 ` Sean Paul
[not found] ` <CAOw6vb+vS3O+Db1_1RSGup7Y2tNjRkxyz7ah817R6nXceSHeFQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-01 15:32 ` Sean Paul
2016-07-08 2:30 ` Yakir Yang
2016-07-01 9:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/rockchip: add an common abstracted PSR driver Yakir Yang
2016-07-01 18:00 ` Sean Paul
2016-07-08 2:12 ` Yakir Yang
2016-07-12 12:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-07-12 15:10 ` Tomasz Figa
2016-07-12 16:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-07-13 3:36 ` Yakir Yang [this message]
2016-07-01 9:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: add the PSR function support Yakir Yang
2016-07-01 19:46 ` Sean Paul
2016-07-08 2:26 ` Yakir Yang
2016-07-08 2:39 ` Yakir Yang
2016-07-12 15:29 ` Sean Paul
2016-07-13 1:57 ` Yakir Yang
2016-07-01 9:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/rockchip: analogix_dp: implement PSR function Yakir Yang
2016-07-01 20:05 ` Sean Paul
2016-07-08 2:32 ` Yakir Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5785B73B.6000301@rock-chips.com \
--to=ykk@rock-chips.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
--cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcheu@chromium.org \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=yzq@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).