From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: "Andy Yan" <andyshrk@163.com>, "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Sandy Huang" <hjc@rock-chips.com>,
"Andy Yan" <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
kernel@collabora.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"FUKAUMI Naoki" <naoki@radxa.com>,
"Algea Cao" <algea.cao@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/rockchip: vop2: Improve display modes handling on RK3588 HDMI0
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 00:27:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66aca370-04c3-4b2b-83ff-8bef3ca0cea6@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8dff095.1555.193d768ad5e.Coremail.andyshrk@163.com>
Hi Maxime,
On 12/18/24 3:36 AM, Andy Yan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 在 2024-12-18 00:59:57,"Cristian Ciocaltea" <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com> 写道:
>> On 12/17/24 6:53 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 06:36:41PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>>> On 12/17/24 5:00 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 07:01:15PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>>>>> Am Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2024, 18:47:44 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 06:23:03PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>>>>>>> Am Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2024, 18:07:57 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 12:15:07PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> The RK3588 specific implementation is currently quite limited in terms
>>>>>>>>>> of handling the full range of display modes supported by the connected
>>>>>>>>>> screens, e.g. 2560x1440@75Hz, 2048x1152@60Hz, 1024x768@60Hz are just a
>>>>>>>>>> few of them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Additionally, it doesn't cope well with non-integer refresh rates like
>>>>>>>>>> 59.94, 29.97, 23.98, etc.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Make use of HDMI0 PHY PLL as a more accurate DCLK source to handle
>>>>>>>>>> all display modes up to 4K@60Hz.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tested-by: FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki@radxa.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 8b2f53ffefdbf1cc8737b3a86e630a03a7fd9348..393fe6aa170aaee9663c4a6d98c1cd6a5ef79392 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ struct vop2_video_port {
>>>>>>>>>> struct drm_crtc crtc;
>>>>>>>>>> struct vop2 *vop2;
>>>>>>>>>> struct clk *dclk;
>>>>>>>>>> + struct clk *dclk_src;
>>>>>>>>>> unsigned int id;
>>>>>>>>>> const struct vop2_video_port_data *data;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -212,6 +213,7 @@ struct vop2 {
>>>>>>>>>> struct clk *hclk;
>>>>>>>>>> struct clk *aclk;
>>>>>>>>>> struct clk *pclk;
>>>>>>>>>> + struct clk *pll_hdmiphy0;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /* optional internal rgb encoder */
>>>>>>>>>> struct rockchip_rgb *rgb;
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -220,6 +222,8 @@ struct vop2 {
>>>>>>>>>> struct vop2_win win[];
>>>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +#define VOP2_MAX_DCLK_RATE 600000 /* kHz */
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> #define vop2_output_if_is_hdmi(x) ((x) == ROCKCHIP_VOP2_EP_HDMI0 || \
>>>>>>>>>> (x) == ROCKCHIP_VOP2_EP_HDMI1)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1033,6 +1037,9 @@ static void vop2_crtc_atomic_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> vop2_crtc_disable_irq(vp, VP_INT_DSP_HOLD_VALID);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + if (vp->dclk_src)
>>>>>>>>>> + clk_set_parent(vp->dclk, vp->dclk_src);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> clk_disable_unprepare(vp->dclk);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> vop2->enable_count--;
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2049,6 +2056,27 @@ static void vop2_crtc_atomic_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> vop2_vp_write(vp, RK3568_VP_MIPI_CTRL, 0);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>>>>>> + * Switch to HDMI PHY PLL as DCLK source for display modes up
>>>>>>>>>> + * to 4K@60Hz, if available, otherwise keep using the system CRU.
>>>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>>>> + if (vop2->pll_hdmiphy0 && mode->crtc_clock <= VOP2_MAX_DCLK_RATE) {
>>>>>>>>>> + drm_for_each_encoder_mask(encoder, crtc->dev, crtc_state->encoder_mask) {
>>>>>>>>>> + struct rockchip_encoder *rkencoder = to_rockchip_encoder(encoder);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + if (rkencoder->crtc_endpoint_id == ROCKCHIP_VOP2_EP_HDMI0) {
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!vp->dclk_src)
>>>>>>>>>> + vp->dclk_src = clk_get_parent(vp->dclk);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + ret = clk_set_parent(vp->dclk, vop2->pll_hdmiphy0);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>>>>>>>> + drm_warn(vop2->drm,
>>>>>>>>>> + "Could not switch to HDMI0 PHY PLL: %d\n", ret);
>>>>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It seems pretty fragile to do it at atomic_enable time, even more so
>>>>>>>>> since you don't lock the parent either.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any reason not to do it in the DRM or clock driver probe, and make sure
>>>>>>>>> you never change the parent somehow?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On rk3588 we have 3 dclk_s and 2 hdmi controllers. Each video-port can
>>>>>>>> use the clock generated from either the hdmi0phy or hdmi1phy, depending
>>>>>>>> on which hdmi-controller it uses.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you actually need to know which vpX will output to which hdmiY to then
>>>>>>>> reparent that dclk to the hdmiphy output.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Rockchip nomenclature isn't super obvious to me, sorry. Is there a
>>>>>>> datasheet for this somewhere? Also, does this vpX -> HDMI-Y mapping need
>>>>>>> to be dynamic?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> VPs are CRTCs in drm-language and each of them can drive a differing
>>>>>> number of output encoders. Those video-ports also have differing output
>>>>>> characteristics in terms of supported resolution and other properties.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The rk3588 TRM has leaked in a number of places, and if you find a
>>>>>> TRM-part2, there is a section labeled "Display Output Interface Description"
>>>>>> that has a nice graphic for that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or in short:
>>>>>> - CRTC(VP)0 supports 8K resolution and can drive DP0+1, HDMI0+1, eDP0+1
>>>>>> [if I'm reading things correctly, 8K together with CRTC1 somehow)
>>>>>> - CRTC(VP)1 supports 4K resolution and can drive DP0+1, HDMI0+1, eDP0+1
>>>>>> - CRTC(VP)2 supports 4K resolution and can drive DP0+1, HDMI0+1, eDP01, DSI0+1
>>>>>> - CRTC(VP)3 supports 2K resolution and can drive DSI0+1 and some BT1120,BT656
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so for the 3 higher resolution CRTCs there are essentially 6 or 8 output options
>>>>>> depending on the board design
>>>>>
>>>>> That's much clearer, thanks. I'm not entirely sure how that links to the
>>>>> need for the PLL to change its parent depending on the ouput. Do you
>>>>> need to always have all the outputs on the same PLL?
>>>>
>>>> One of the problems is that the PHY PLLs cannot be used as clock sources
>>>> for resolutions above 4K@60Hz, while VOP2 on RK3588 supports up to 8K@60Hz,
>>>> which is supposed to be handled by the system CRU.
>>>
>>> But can that system CRU drive resolutions lower than 4k@60? If so, why
>>> do we bother with PHYs?
>>
>> It can, but it's not accurate enough to support all modes, e.g. those
>> having fractional refresh rates, among others. That's actually the
>> reason we'd want to make use of the PHY PLLs.
>
> Not only that. For resolutions lower than 4k@60, if we use system cur as dclk parent,
> it can't sync with HDMI TMDS clock , this could lead to stability/compatibility i issues,
> which may not be easy to encounter, but we have indeed experienced them few timems
> in a large amount of productization practice.
Could you please indicate which would be the required changes to make
this acceptable upstream and unblock the series?
Thanks,
Cristian
>>>> Moreover, the 2 PLLs are shared between 3 out of the 4 video ports already
>>>> mentioned by Heiko. There is quite a bit of complexity in downstream
>>>> driver to handle all possible usecases - see [1] for a brief description on
>>>> how was that designed to work.
>>>
>>> That's a generic allocation issue. Multiple drivers (vc4 for example)
>>> has this issue for other components. It can be fairly easily dealt with
>>> at atomic_check time.
>>>
>>> Maxime
>>
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-11 10:15 [PATCH v2 0/5] Improve Rockchip VOP2 display modes handling on RK3588 HDMI0 Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-11 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: display: vop2: Add optional PLL clock properties Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-11 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/rockchip: vop2: Drop unnecessary if_pixclk_rate computation Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-11 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/rockchip: vop2: Improve display modes handling on RK3588 HDMI0 Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-11 17:07 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-12-11 17:23 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-12-11 17:47 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-12-11 18:01 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-12-17 15:00 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-12-17 16:36 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-17 16:53 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-12-17 16:59 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-18 1:36 ` Andy Yan
2025-01-08 22:27 ` Cristian Ciocaltea [this message]
2024-12-11 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable HDMI0 PHY clk provider on RK3588 Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-11 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add HDMI0 PHY PLL clock source to VOP2 " Cristian Ciocaltea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66aca370-04c3-4b2b-83ff-8bef3ca0cea6@collabora.com \
--to=cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=algea.cao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
--cc=andyshrk@163.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=hjc@rock-chips.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=naoki@radxa.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox