From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
To: <wens@kernel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
<linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: rockchip: fix NULL ptr deref in rockchip_pinctrl_parse_groups()
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 17:36:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6cb84280-9290-4cf1-91cf-ccece1a0bb27@omp.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v67ihFehEwSc-rX=U-KJdvao_588G8iVEoSXuJ_-gnd50w@mail.gmail.com>
On 9/8/25 8:53 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
[...]
>> Am Mittwoch, 3. September 2025, 21:48:54 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Sergey Shtylyov:
>>> In the Rockchip driver, rockchip_pinctrl_parse_groups() assumes that the
>>> "rockchip,pins" property will always be present in the DT node it parses
>>> and so doesn't check the result of of_get_property() for NULL. If the DT
>>> passed to the kernel happens to have such property missing, then we will
>>> get a kernel oops when the pointer is dereferenced in the *for* loop just
>>> a few lines after the call. I think it's better to play safe by checking
>>> the list variable for NULL (and reporting error if so), like we check the
>>> size variable for validity further down...
>>>
>>> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the Svace static
>>> analysis tool.
>>>
>>> Fixes: d3e5116119bd ("pinctrl: add pinctrl driver for Rockchip SoCs")
>>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
>>
>> Assuming that the DT is our friend, really is a bad assumption :-) .
>
> If this is invalid, perhaps you should make the "rockchip,pins" property
> required in the binding?
Looking at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/rockchip,pinctrl.txt
in 5.10.y, it was marked as required. The modern YAML bindings don't seem to
say that, at least explicitly...
[...]
MBR, Sergey
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-08 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-03 19:48 [PATCH] pinctrl: rockchip: fix NULL ptr deref in rockchip_pinctrl_parse_groups() Sergey Shtylyov
2025-09-07 17:28 ` Heiko Stuebner
2025-09-08 5:53 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2025-09-08 14:36 ` Sergey Shtylyov [this message]
2025-09-08 12:59 ` Linus Walleij
2025-10-16 9:29 ` Sergey Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6cb84280-9290-4cf1-91cf-ccece1a0bb27@omp.ru \
--to=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox