Re: [PATCH 00/40] arm64: dts: rockchip: Wire up frl-enable-gpios for RK3576/RK3588 boards

[Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>]

Hi Heiko,

On 4/17/26 2:34 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Cristan,
> 
> Am Freitag, 17. April 2026, 11:24:34 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Cristian Ciocaltea:
> 
> [...]
> 
>> Cristian Ciocaltea (40):
>>       arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-100ask-dshanpi-a1
>>       arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-armsom-sige5
>>       arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-evb1-v10
>>       arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-evb2-v10
>>       arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-luckfox-core3576
>>       arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-nanopi-m5
>>       arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-nanopi-r76s
>>       arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-roc-pc
>>       arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-rock-4d
> 
> I do think one patch per SoC (rk3576, rk3588, rk3588s) would make more
> sense, because these patches really are mostly identical :-)

Yeah, apologies for the large number of patches, I went this way to allow
per-board reviews.  As previously noted, I tried to identify the GPIO pins from
multiple sources, so I'm not entirely sure about the accuracy in every case.

Would it be preferable to squash the patches per SoC and board vendor, instead?

Thanks,
Cristian

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip