From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7D46C25B78 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 20:48:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From :Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=OdkTMUPYQ6vTMqYVaHFjHKfdVcLcB7Bws+cReL+QwWY=; b=jhEcw1H4cwmh79vidP3SYlxVTf J0gkvgy21jnH61yOuhj5kT8knPcT3+ExWwNf/h8SfnwIgvjnsK1skS1ZsmodJD5tSRhQiZCbMtjLL ZEwgG27EUk1vUj8POblkt7ejLRDkapwFqb0BPYwJVcr4gSkoDXHCFGRoKJW2DeoZqEo+PVALKFfA0 IqvKlQy1NFmEcUhCgP9DHD9k6SYdcn0fEzR9t+eYb+FH3vuq4B3cYu/G9gjCAzEigqAux9AQoxaaV KaoNKnFRJns/65WjDp6ec/Nvs4P2xwl7GspczsxLUmsuobgdbQyJia5H5DkczwMbt+kvSwElkFtpH Bj2qxOrA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sEb5E-00000003kmr-3qTm; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 20:48:40 +0000 Received: from mail.manjaro.org ([2a01:4f8:c0c:51f3::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sEb5A-00000003kmG-0pFn; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 20:48:38 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1717534112; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jaTzlawGlDcYRhQAm+R1AsWpCyayK2cAnVa+Y0OsHVQ=; b=AyEZbuQEG/qqS8hCg4QaBIOxBX5BDnlwIu08AMxosoc84FDiVVV5NnCCTRWyhFB4zo5xVV Mqf8T7Qr9+QUghlk4yVtaLV0HE9dLTRffsJyizkktmF01hfJTm8DXRaX92E2WANTcuw9qC w4A4pFK81Zc09M++1RkPeePFtqjojo5/EVcinZZBjENohmQv3PByt+ZdvBqTT4sIw3l9XQ 0xixHMlzRPKwYzIJHUZ5J9El7sfvISr3oEKry2exmbn/eKp2SLdv/reoa0IGUazY4NSGwV ry6MW+Ao7vnlq9nEmfX+fJgg4lbEia7kzrfWlCJ4aCEfSCWSNDe2v0vQO34A5A== Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 22:48:30 +0200 From: Dragan Simic To: Alexey Charkov Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, heiko@sntech.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quentin.schulz@cherry.de, wens@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, didi.debian@cknow.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Make preparations for per-RK3588-variant OPPs In-Reply-To: <82db817a908b761d8c3d73ea04714314@manjaro.org> References: <673dcf47596e7bc8ba065034e339bb1bbf9cdcb0.1716948159.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> <8f8623e29a479c4108141302e708dc3b@manjaro.org> <166cc4e46f31644a50306625b2ab18a6@manjaro.org> <82db817a908b761d8c3d73ea04714314@manjaro.org> Message-ID: <75563ad3f6bf6b6c8b151ab0cc26b490@manjaro.org> X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240604_134836_724208_D6C1E513 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.92 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hello Alexey, On 2024-05-30 21:31, Dragan Simic wrote: > I'm sorry for my delayed response, had some "IRL stuff" to take care > of. [...] > On 2024-05-29 16:05, Alexey Charkov wrote: >> The problem I have with -common is that there are several layers of >> "common" even among just the three of these chip revisions, and a >> clear inheritance hierarchy between them (i.e. RK3588j and RK3588 also >> have a sizeable chunk of their IP blocks that is "common" between >> these two variants, in addition to those shared among all three >> variants) > > Hmm, I see, that's a rather valid concern. How about using "-base" > for what I called "-common", and "-extra" for what I called "-fullfat", > for the lack of a better term? Using "-extra" takes inspiration from > the way Linux distribution package repositories are commonly named, so > it should be rather familiar to nearly everyone. > > Also, "-base" and "-extra" are rather short, so their shortness would > also make them stand out in the directory listing as something that > isn't > just another board .dts or .dtsi file, which can only help. [...] Since there were no complaints, I'll move forward with sending a "real" patch that uses "-base" and "-extra". _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip