Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix some clocks' name to be more standard style

[Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>]

On 2016/11/2 15:04, Jianqun Xu wrote:
> Fix aclk_emmcgrf to aclk_emmc_grf, and fix aclk_emmccore to be
> aclk_emmc_core.
>

What is the standard style should be?

TRM uses aclk_emmccore but not aclk_emmc_core, so should it be more
standrad to keep it as-is?

> Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> index 2c7cba7..b3df2c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> @@ -935,11 +935,11 @@ static struct rockchip_clk_branch rk3399_clk_branches[] __initdata = {
>  			RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(6), 13, GFLAGS),
>  	COMPOSITE_NOGATE(ACLK_EMMC, "aclk_emmc", mux_aclk_emmc_p, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
>  			RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(21), 7, 1, MFLAGS, 0, 5, DFLAGS),
> -	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_CORE, "aclk_emmccore", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> +	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_CORE, "aclk_emmc_core", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
>  			RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 8, GFLAGS),
>  	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_NOC, "aclk_emmc_noc", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
>  			RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 9, GFLAGS),
> -	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_GRF, "aclk_emmcgrf", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> +	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_GRF, "aclk_emmc_grf", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
>  			RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 10, GFLAGS),
>
>  	/* perilp0 */
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin