From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A777C5B543 for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 17:35:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=xJwDdzRqMmTEscQYfyvhMfDz9X7gssQBruJvtelTFfQ=; b=ufHy+urNlErdfd DMPzbUE3uhe9kcPjd4ihClLPs4IAlvOCxZunbGh0abyFbA1CEr/CrP4p1eDJukMkJHS0su+eaACSi 8C4AlYq4xnoVNgpv+53RDVYryPcQOp7z9V9abOsE+T60xInbLWHxAEaGGZc524WKLKOrIGP5yedOq wUj/797xl8LO03uM2Sqx7r6ex+04p04Bl4noNCuZ2pLOvtf5nB1EJV8iseYh2+pFsi7ObgaPj8njE 85VYGfCoQPQp9r7XwrKot7c4czk4gpb54cgx8pGrQKh5/ywKUvlIF7FU03ahAirxaypSGcaYsYcpJ EyFRRhkVFGHV2W9JmIPA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uL3dZ-00000001Pln-3rEC; Fri, 30 May 2025 17:35:21 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uL3TT-00000001Oei-43r4; Fri, 30 May 2025 17:24:57 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEEC5C57FB; Fri, 30 May 2025 17:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EF92C4CEEB; Fri, 30 May 2025 17:24:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1748625895; bh=Fi8xBM8N/1UJOJHg+QvBM0v5UxznL2mUiHKiHfA5xiU=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WA07GutGWsgZNiDexF2R2ziRpCuD5VGsGMBidzJJNXYwr3fAn4/40SRxfqbxHNV41 zcUTDtgSPsC86Knw91KtxVKLGXAHVo2TPns+MEEwP491DS9HGMyFFbf3HwA+N4h0Z1 TdnbHnNfGrUbrQyg1fz6pfn+w30ZTooUa4LKxAyn8/vlGzaTrcjXkJbrdVKbn9V2vo vdLLkw75u6tBwb2+q3y17llDCBF+laGq91eSEzZPCN3nP0lLdlIMcY5x4vlYTtQ4WH Ze5Hb5tgH8x5oUUPF76E3SfWU58s+TCOXyrwjNB4/mDlGKhRUzawgiMAKqQGaTJo9v WLdVLGubVBVsw== Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 19:24:53 +0200 From: Niklas Cassel To: Bjorn Helgaas , Manivannan Sadhasivam CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi , =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Heiko Stuebner , Wilfred Mallawa , Damien Le Moal , Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>, Laszlo Fiat , =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_=5BPATCH_v2_1/4=5D_PCI=3A_dw-rockchip=3A_Do_not_e?= =?US-ASCII?Q?numerate_bus_before_endpoint_devices_are_ready?= User-Agent: Thunderbird for Android In-Reply-To: <20250530171937.GA198252@bhelgaas> References: <20250530171937.GA198252@bhelgaas> Message-ID: <76F22449-6A2D-4F64-BF23-DF733E6B9165@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250530_102456_056223_2584A4E9 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.32 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 30 May 2025 19:19:37 CEST, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >I think all drivers should wait PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS (100ms) after exit >from Conventional Reset (if port only supports <= 5.0 GT/s) or after >link training completes (if port supports > 5.0 GT/s). > >> So I don't think this is a device specific issue but rather >> controller specific. And this makes the Qcom patch that I dropped a >> valid one (ofc with change in description). > >URL? PATCH 4/4 of this series. Kind regards, Niklas _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip