From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB900C54E64 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:11:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=RWNm+D/FB4TaaItRG/VPpLqfp9fhI7u6wDgZH/Ki0Bw=; b=lSedw3lTYJK9qX 2lcZjEdSnnEA0jbQ1Ji3LIVWZ/BqAu1zUdWSUvGB9HFZS66bBSYPfuYaZsePuPhwznjg5Sbns7gfP ViwXa8D7jAB6+gFIYs5QRaH3dLX3m/iuJdo0TkXui26apkq09oyvev6SvQbJf6xa/7OJ4IG5SVYzw p7Q+9gTMgI8CTQqbwkgsMtHQdg++fOQwyiq8y1F8LSssVcGdBpHywgBoNtw6xgCZ+534No7UMDxYk bkkn3n6aGhLlGxEDDp6uMiS1/5Lw9Oy3Qb86el1Nvh6xzqxG+xTag/8Fngtl+HObWN+8PuXIQ6wjR BnfAhVGrSU3eHY8ZXGsQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1roqf9-00000001k0F-2pcg; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:11:19 +0000 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1roqf3-00000001jvM-2tCs; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:11:16 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V3PDj3HrVz6K5Yf; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 04:10:13 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml100003.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.160.210]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCB1A140A35; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 04:11:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500002.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.78) by lhrpeml100003.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:11:01 +0000 Received: from lhrpeml500002.china.huawei.com ([7.191.160.78]) by lhrpeml500002.china.huawei.com ([7.191.160.78]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.035; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:11:01 +0000 From: Niyas Sait To: Jonathan Cameron , Shimrra Shai CC: "heiko@sntech.de" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org" , "max.schwarz@online.de" Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/0] (proposed?) Add ACPI binding to Rockchip RK3xxx I2C bus Thread-Topic: [PATCH 0/0] (proposed?) Add ACPI binding to Rockchip RK3xxx I2C bus Thread-Index: AQHafsr0Wl6sT07ewk2P4IUJwaVt4bFI4A9w Importance: high X-Priority: 1 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:11:01 +0000 Message-ID: <78763d69bae04204b2af37201b09f8b5@huawei.com> References: <20240322103521.00001a12@Huawei.com> <20240322155146.22755-1-shimmyshai00@gmail.com> <20240325154150.00003bde@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20240325154150.00003bde@Huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.48.158.103] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240325_131114_148955_011FB19E X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.91 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org > Niyas, could you forward what you had to Shimrra? (I can find it if you don't have it any more). I am on holiday so only had a chance to skim through the email. By the way, the half-baked patch is here [1]. The patch only supports fixed clock sources and require further changes to support multiple clock sources. I will have a look at the discussions when I am back. Hopefully the patch gives some idea. Feel free to take up the patch and fill any missing bits. [1] https://github.com/niyas-sait/linux-acpi/blob/main/0001-acpi-add-clock-bindings-for-fixed-clock-resources.patch Thanks Niyas _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip