From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] PM / Domains: Allow genpd users to specify default active wakeup behavior Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 14:59:25 +0100 Message-ID: <7ha804lr2a.fsf@baylibre.com> References: <1509473494-19740-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1509473494-19740-2-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1509473494-19740-2-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> (Geert Uytterhoeven's message of "Tue, 31 Oct 2017 19:11:30 +0100") Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Ulf Hansson , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , Matthias Brugger , Heiko Stuebner , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > It is quite common for PM Domains to require slave devices to be kept > active during system suspend if they are to be used as wakeup sources. > To enable this, currently each PM Domain or driver has to provide its > own gpd_dev_ops.active_wakeup() callback. > > Introduce a new flag GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP to consolidate this. > If specified, all slave devices configured as wakeup sources will be > kept active during system suspend. > > PM Domains that need more fine-grained controls, based on the slave > device, can still provide their own callbacks, as before. > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman