From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A5EC0219D for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:46:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From :Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=tJUCj8SLUzApMOJ4rKz5U12xNNDQJEVu/fQd+0tlXV0=; b=uvz9uFyaxEoaOMGyGc4yrKES8m lgkxTAu+kwCibZj6MdgFlwCtR1LeONfMypxvcbprTbyxC2+Sz3EVmEOPtruq1IYDsBV/lQ6+dWB1a 9+a0zJ8gmlVdYj7RQlejNF8F1NHDsHtLqIRSkLcLduA7LCkW6EjYOdPmwedWjCbnykOKv9R+BQcc/ ctsfybn3P1HWuVBZt3Z8F3T6FxtyY95+HAdQ9spZfM+wAgqJG5mJ3J/mjqIOy+/HiPdk1PBnM2JQx NDd+pmTy6ia/r0HLpoIw9AS/wEdL+YA1tFaJXaZ2ne46dHhLU7HN2EwbDLFqwifAlxTa4ScekodXd ZSwxxRlQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tgTN1-0000000AmAX-3iSn; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 18:46:31 +0000 Received: from mail.manjaro.org ([116.203.91.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tgRtl-0000000ARZZ-1pCx; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 17:12:14 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1738948331; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TJez20VszaxXxj16JRKu4nw9gm00N8RRdq6k9u0AALs=; b=V5/suE0s6oboVud4LDBpamVYDrXqsi8RJPxWLTE2+OK9RWMpYDTiGsmDcSVqaI3eWFAz4h 4gKGUmUH0lriTYz6mztqG53hyQadYcUVIBq2OfILB90liak70DL9Rk2OiSI6CNflipScd4 PPtIqyvwPkfP1Zuioojr8i7tFgGcbscIdQubYhwO5xrQRUH5PnZ9BI4/15+h4fJgqKGn0R Pumgn53Y2HSZ5pOkiIZTp0SEz3u2zWAcnMMpru4gbCFn3V9mEpMCoZobzcoZuq8ETUuAyQ 1BoJc/fDRKh6YHfHIUmZ0NvUcRB1pep8rK/8vX/P6b7ICZdmZVXZMjqq8Bzq6A== Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 18:12:10 +0100 From: Dragan Simic To: Diederik de Haas Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Maximilian Weigand , Marek Kraus , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: rockchip: add 'chassis-type' property on PineNote In-Reply-To: References: <20250207111157.297276-1-didi.debian@cknow.org> <502523554b482a2e10d85d37761932a0@manjaro.org> Message-ID: <97df4fc0db4bf43a2a3f2d4d110e3105@manjaro.org> X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250207_091213_636150_B7374344 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.37 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2025-02-07 17:39, Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Fri Feb 7, 2025 at 4:01 PM CET, Dragan Simic wrote: >> On 2025-02-07 12:11, Diederik de Haas wrote: >>> Add the recommended chassis-type root node property so userspace can >>> request the form factor and adjust their behavior accordingly. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas >>> Link: >>> https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#root-node >> >> Maybe the Link tag should be converted into a "[1]" reference? >> To me, this is more like a reference for this DT addition. >> >> In general, references can also be placed closer to the contents >> they back up, which isn't possible with Link tags, but of course >> that doesn't matter much in this case. > > I generally use the "[1]" format when linking to specific claims, which > I could've done wrt the "recommended". But I considered this a general > background link and then I prefer to do it via a Link tag. > > If requested by a maintainer I'll change it ofc, but otherwise I prefer > to keep it as is. Indeed, in this case it's pretty much irrelevant which format is used. In fact, it may look nicer to use a Link tag, because there are only a few lines in the patch description in total. :) My comment was more about longer commit/patch descriptions with multiple references, which should benefit from placing references closer to the backed-up contents using the "[*]" layout, instead of relying on Link tags to bunch it all together at the end of the description. _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip