From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51E5CC3ABDD for ; Tue, 20 May 2025 11:39:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: In-Reply-To:References:To:From:Subject:Cc:Message-Id:Date:Mime-Version: Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date :Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=KwTLALGq9pGLLvaX+1RjK8U8koxrNo4GCljp8tkBL+0=; b=G3ZKQX90EfET39gb/pzsAU1fZY NG3JFwCcdk9Gd49bxntzY7gcgM5I2whjJI6R041pB3HvteBger8OnivMXczx+n/KXiCGebyE83raT B2QfN0EYxsO9juZSWCJGngxoyQTuTtIRVMcjEpBVv5pYM5N5G1qL41Mqgdj4HCSdAxRO+kCBYYuTm 7hWaQE56t6jjMhFFftPGrBCnEOU3S7K0weKGqb29NrXnnRbdPLBLs+WPRSjw8CcbLjLSGPeHmgw8Q udD26hmE3mTgp9G95n3svla6anPJSua996F7HoLK+bkN6yh92JCQpUdPDXgBrUFa1CKiy0yk0bvFJ 1/Cveq2A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uHLJx-0000000CgKR-48q4; Tue, 20 May 2025 11:39:45 +0000 Received: from out-177.mta0.migadu.com ([91.218.175.177]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uHLJv-0000000CgIS-34Rb for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 May 2025 11:39:44 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cknow.org; s=key1; t=1747741170; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IHQQ72WR0uJaCYKSMFe0s4zfbhTKw+KEo8c67zUoozQ=; b=AoqykRfGY0eNCQZe3pCtucLUbH68xSCZYcf3tGww1k2ClaBe+2D684FSiAgrlzUvmz3tgV Uw+YIrjBvbQwnjaJEd8lo43Jajl75GPwqBu3ud+WKe0VdbC8GWvKOgTypBKOvJ0Tzjg36f /dJ9+8ZMtGBXieBs3wpobQ7kyz23IaCZzhpnOlCDfrTdsbR3Lxilt/Kwqmed94GObnEn14 8TSDFjBuH3AnyoM4AdRbQeFZNMB7RbklFaE1CycjsIBnDSe1b4HpZ1Y5igJT2tDSk1FJ92 iOuwkmr2RjIvNhGoARaTAc8k4IYIv1q9dUcWrKkCMd/41P11jN2BmOqi1KndUQ== Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 13:39:18 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: Add SoC prefix to register definitions X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Diederik de Haas" To: "Yao Zi" , "Vinod Koul" , "Kishon Vijay Abraham I" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Heiko Stuebner" , "Frank Wang" , "Andy Yan" , "Cristian Ciocaltea" , "Detlev Casanova" , "Shresth Prasad" , "Chukun Pan" , "Jonas Karlman" References: <20250519161612.14261-1-ziyao@disroot.org> <20250519161612.14261-4-ziyao@disroot.org> In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250520_043943_912759_353134AE X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.62 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8372322661463851853==" Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --===============8372322661463851853== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=d0bc349ebc3c06724e8275064f50ac7acc361a9610a706c47518c54416fd; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --d0bc349ebc3c06724e8275064f50ac7acc361a9610a706c47518c54416fd Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue May 20, 2025 at 1:12 PM CEST, Yao Zi wrote: > If putting RK3528 at first really confuses you, I'd like to add some > extra comments to explicitly split these two kinds of register layouts > apart and claim they aren't compatible. Although to me it's somehow > obvious, as most definitions are prefixed with either RK3528 or RK3568. No need. This is just another PEBKAC issue. Cheers, Diederik --d0bc349ebc3c06724e8275064f50ac7acc361a9610a706c47518c54416fd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCaCxp6wAKCRDXblvOeH7b boWnAQC5MIhxImiAlK1tUu+xrN+HsDpoKbj77BWe5c4WxhafxwD/Ulo4r6l68aWF xF7+bQnpCwX2RacAOaELrsdy8/Z02Qo= =ZrQ3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d0bc349ebc3c06724e8275064f50ac7acc361a9610a706c47518c54416fd-- --===============8372322661463851853== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip --===============8372322661463851853==--