Hi (again),

On Wed Jun 18, 2025 at 12:32 AM CEST, Olivier Benjamin wrote:
> The RK3399's MIPI DSI has 2 ports: in an out. The definition of
> the port property necessitates the value of #address-cells to be 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Benjamin <olivier.benjamin@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> index 5ebc380a24df86ba7172b0950b89cac56b61c507..5a7341fb6bcb0613af6f3ac31d99355a0f890e89 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ &mipi_dsi {
>  
>  	ports {
>  		mipi_out: port@1 {
> -			#address-cells = <0>;
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
>  			#size-cells = <0>;
>  			reg = <1>;
>  

In rk3399-base.dtsi there is already a definition for mipi-in and
mipi-out. AFAICT what this change does is require a reg property on the
endpoint and I don't think that's correct.

It seems to me that all you need is a mipi_out_panel definition.
So what I came up with is this:

```sh
$ git diff
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
index 04ba4c4565d0..b175aeed99e2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
@@ -466,18 +466,6 @@ &mipi_dsi {
 	status = "okay";
 	clock-master;

-	ports {
-		mipi_out: port@1 {
-			#address-cells = <0>;
-			#size-cells = <0>;
-			reg = <1>;
-
-			mipi_out_panel: endpoint {
-				remote-endpoint = <&mipi_in_panel>;
-			};
-		};
-	};
-
 	panel@0 {
 		compatible = "hannstar,hsd060bhw4";
 		reg = <0>;
@@ -495,6 +483,12 @@ mipi_in_panel: endpoint {
 	};
 };

+&mipi_out {
+	mipi_out_panel: endpoint {
+		remote-endpoint = <&mipi_in_panel>;
+	};
+};
+
 &pmu_io_domains {
 	pmu1830-supply = <&vcc_1v8>;
 	status = "okay";
```

I don't have a PPP so I can't verify it, but ``make CHECK_DTBS=y W=1
rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dtb`` no longer reports issues wrt
dsi@ff960000 (after I also fixed the panel compatible like in patch 1
and added a LCD1_RST pinctrl definition as indicated in my reply to
patch 3).

Cheers,
  Diederik